Opposition Leader Jamale Pringle has come under intense scrutiny following his recent handling of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) session. During a heated discussion on the Browne and Browne Show, panelists lambasted Pringle for what they described as a superficial and ineffective approach to overseeing state finances. Critics accused him of prioritizing theatrics over substantive accountability, with one panelist characterizing the meeting as a ‘pageant and a presentation’ rather than a rigorous examination of public accounts. Pringle’s inability to grasp the complexities of the issues at hand was a recurring theme in the critique. Panelists noted that he appeared to read pre-prepared questions without fully understanding the responses, and failed to ask follow-up questions that would have demonstrated deeper engagement. One commentator likened his performance to ‘someone still trying to grapple with the alphabet,’ highlighting his apparent struggles with comprehension. The criticism extended beyond the panelists, with callers to the program joining the chorus of disapproval. One particularly scathing caller described Pringle as having ‘a coconut head with cement in it,’ questioning how someone with business experience could fail to grasp basic accounting and auditing principles. The backlash underscores growing concerns about Pringle’s leadership capabilities and his effectiveness in holding the government accountable. As the debate continues, the incident raises broader questions about the role and expectations of opposition leaders in ensuring transparency and fiscal responsibility.