The Surinamese government’s decision to withhold subsidies from rice farmers has sparked widespread concern, not only for the agricultural sector but for the entire nation. Rice fields in Nickerie, often referred to as the lungs of the country’s food supply, are under threat as the government turns its back on the very people who sustain the nation’s food security. Farmers in Nickerie are grappling with rising costs of fertilizers, fuel, labor, and maintenance, while fluctuating global market prices further exacerbate their struggles. These farmers are not just producers; they are the backbone of national food security, employment, exports, and economic stability. Without government support, they risk falling into a cycle of high-interest commercial loans, while cheap imported rice from Asia floods the local market. This could lead to reduced production, increased imports, higher consumer prices, and growing poverty in agricultural districts. The refusal to invest in farmers signals a dangerous shift towards dependency on foreign food chains, a risk Suriname cannot afford. In contrast, developed nations like the Netherlands, the U.S., and India prioritize agricultural subsidies to ensure food security and support sustainable production. Subsidies are not a handout but a strategic investment in irrigation, mechanization, storage, and efficiency. The government’s rigid stance, without offering alternative solutions, reflects shortsightedness rather than strength. True leadership involves investing in the sectors that keep the nation running. Suriname cannot rely solely on oil and mining; without agriculture, Nickerie, and the rice fields that have fed generations, the country risks losing its soul. It is time for the government to shift from distant policies to active engagement, recognizing that neglecting the rice farmer today will lead to scarcity on every plate tomorrow.
标签: Suriname
苏里南
-

Adhin: Wet Staatsschuld basis voor striktere begrotingsdiscipline
The National Assembly has taken a significant step toward enhancing the financial governance of the state by approving amendments to the State Debt Law, according to Assembly Chairman Ashwin Adhin. The amendments, passed unanimously with 36 votes, aim to consolidate and professionalize the legal framework governing state debt. Adhin expressed gratitude to all members for their contributions, emphasizing their collaborative efforts in achieving a balanced approach. The revised law establishes strict conditions for exceeding the debt ceiling, requiring a debt strategy aligned with Article 15a. Additionally, the Minister of Finance & Planning must now submit an annual state debt plan alongside the state budget presentation. This provision links the budgetary cycle with debt management, reinforcing the Assembly’s oversight of the state’s macro-financial stability. Adhin highlighted the inclusion of a limited transition period in Article 28, which he described as a clear signal of budgetary discipline and timely debt normalization. The introduction of a Deputy Administrator-General at the State Debt Bureau was also noted as a crucial measure to ensure operational continuity and strengthen institutional capacity. Adhin stated that the law transforms debt management into a sustainable financial policy tool, guided by principles of transparency, parliamentary approval, and systematic debt reduction. However, he cautioned that the law addresses only the symptoms, not the root causes, of financial challenges. ‘The real solution lies in boosting production, exports, and revenue streams,’ Adhin asserted. ‘Only through the real economy can we achieve lasting financial sovereignty.’
