A contentious dispute over procedural boundaries and parliamentary decorum disrupted Wednesday’s session of Jamaica’s Public Administration and Appropriations Committee (PAAC), exposing deep divisions regarding the committee’s oversight authority. The confrontation emerged when Opposition members confronted Government MP Heroy Clarke of St James Central over his persistent interruptions during questioning of state entity representatives. The committee had convened specifically to review the National Water Commission’s recovery operations following Hurricane Melissa, but proceedings quickly devolved into a heated debate about the very nature of the PAAC’s constitutional role. Opposition parliamentarians accused Clarke of systematically undermining their legitimate oversight function by repeatedly challenging questions he deemed outside the committee’s purview. Clarke defended his interventions as necessary to maintain discipline and fairness, arguing that extended questioning by individual members could marginalize others and that infrastructure discussions properly belonged to other committees. The debate revealed fundamental disagreements about interpretation of the PAAC’s mandate, with St Mary Central MP Omar Newell citing specific constitutional provisions that authorize broad examination of government efficiency and administration. Newell called for a reset in committee conduct, emphasizing that “we can’t just bully and shout out to get our own way” and that disagreements should be resolved through proper points of order rather than loud interruptions. St James Southern MP Nekeisha Burchell countered Clarke’s position by asserting that public assets and performance—including infrastructure—fall squarely within the PAAC’s responsibility to ensure value for public expenditure. Committee Chairman Peter Bunting intervened to remind members of their shared objective to serve Jamaican citizens regardless of political affiliation, while subtly referencing Clarke’s former role as Deputy Speaker to underscore expectations of decorum. The exchange highlighted ongoing tensions between government and opposition members regarding parliamentary oversight mechanisms and the appropriate boundaries of committee authority in examining state administration.
博客
-

FIX THE BOWLING!
The West Indies cricket team’s impressive five-match winning streak at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup came to a crushing halt on Thursday, suffering a decisive nine-wicket defeat against South Africa in their Super Eight Group 1 encounter in Ahmedabad. The loss has prompted serious concerns about the team’s bowling capabilities and batting strategy from veteran commentator Joseph ‘Reds’ Perreira.
Despite posting a competitive total of 176/8 from their 20 overs, thanks largely to a record eighth-wicket partnership of 89 runs between Romario Shepherd (52 not out) and Jason Holder (49), the Caribbean side proved unable to defend their score. South Africa’s commanding chase saw them reach 177/1 in just 16.1 overs, with captain Aiden Markram leading the charge with a spectacular 82 runs from 46 deliveries.
Perreira characterized the West Indies bowling performance as ‘ragged’ and called for immediate improvements from head coach Daren Sammy and his staff. ‘The bowling was ragged and Daren Sammy and company will have to look at how they can improve this bowling,’ Perreira told the Jamaica Observer. He particularly expressed disappointment in fast bowler Shamar Joseph’s performance and questioned whether pacer Jayden Seales should be brought in from the reserves bench.
The batting approach also came under scrutiny after the top order collapsed to 83/7 before Shepherd and Holder’s recovery effort. Perreira noted a apparent lack of execution despite pre-match planning, stating ‘They discussed a plan last night and this morning, but when you go out there and you take guard, the batsmen are responsible for executing that plan.’
The result leaves both West Indies and India level on two points in Group 1, though the Caribbean side maintains a significantly superior net run rate of 1.791 compared to India’s -0.1. This sets up a crucial final Super Eight match between the two teams on Sunday, with a semi-final berth hanging in the balance.
-

More money for refs?
Jamaica’s emergence as a powerhouse for producing elite football referees may soon be accompanied by improved financial incentives on the domestic front. Gregory Daley, the newly appointed General Secretary of the Jamaica Football Federation (JFF) and a former referee himself, has indicated that increasing match fees for local officials is under serious consideration.
This development comes as Jamaican referees continue to earn international recognition, with 21 currently on the FIFA panel—one of the highest representations in the CONCACAF region. These officials, who earn approximately $10,000 per match in Jamaica’s Premier League plus a $75-per-mile travel allowance, have become what Daley describes as “the best-kept secret” of Jamaican football excellence.
Despite the constant focus on the Reggae Boyz national team, Daley emphasizes that refereeing represents one of Jamaica’s most consistently successful football departments internationally. His comments highlight the paradox between Jamaica’s refereeing prestige and the lack of domestic appreciation for these achievements.
The proposed compensation review would extend beyond match fees to include training sessions and other professional commitments. Daley acknowledges the significant personal investment referees make, often traveling across the island at their own expense while maintaining the highest professional standards required for international competitions.
Jamaica’s refereeing success story finds further validation with two officials—Daneon Parchment and Oshane Nation—currently in contention for selection to officiate at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Both are VAR-certified, with Nation’s potential selection automatically including his Assistant Referee Ojay Duhaney.
This would continue Jamaica’s legacy in World Cup officiating that began with Owen Powell (1998), followed by Peter Prendergast (2002), and several officials at Women’s and age-group World Cups.
Beyond financial improvements, Daley stresses the importance of enhanced communication and engagement with match officials to prevent past disruptions and build a more collaborative relationship moving forward.
-

Assembleevoorzitter: Hof bereid te kijken naar rationalisering geldelijke voorzieningen rechterlijke macht
In a significant development for Suriname’s governance structure, National Assembly Chairman Ashwin Adhin has confirmed ongoing consultations with the Judiciary regarding financial provisions within the judicial system. The dialogue marks a cooperative effort between two crucial branches of government to address compensation structures for judicial officials.
Chairman Adhin disclosed to Starnieuws that he conducted formal discussions in his official capacity with the Court of Justice, particularly engaging with Court President Iwan Rasoelbaks. This diplomatic exchange has subsequently been followed by written correspondence from the judiciary, solidifying the commitment to mutual understanding.
The constitutional framework allows every Assembly member to initiate proposals within this context, though Adhin emphasized his role as presiding officer to conduct more focused negotiations with the judicial branch. These smaller-scale discussions aim to meticulously examine proposals, insights, and factual information before reaching any determinations.
Adhin reassured the public that the matter is being treated with appropriate seriousness between state powers, operating under the fundamental principle that financial provisions for the judiciary must be governed by statutory regulations. This approach ensures constitutional compliance while maintaining the dignity of judicial institutions.
The Assembly leadership has deliberately separated two parallel processes to avoid procedural conflicts: the ongoing modernization of judicial infrastructure through parliamentary bills, and the separate consideration of financial provisions including judicial remuneration and emoluments. This sequential treatment allows each initiative to receive dedicated preparation and attention.
Furthermore, Adhin highlighted that the 2026 national budget remains on the parliamentary agenda, confirming that authorities are maintaining a rigorous yet orderly schedule for these complementary governance initiatives.
-

Heldere visie op rol en taken van business controller in veranderende organisaties
The Anton de Kom University of Suriname marked a significant academic milestone on February 25, 2026, with Professor Arno Geurtsen RC delivering his inaugural address upon assuming the prestigious Chair in Governance & Control. The ceremony at the university’s Interfaculty for Graduate Studies and Research centered on redefining the evolving role of business controllers in modern organizational structures.
Professor Geurtsen identified a critical gap in contemporary business practice: widespread ambiguity regarding the precise expectations, responsibilities, and competencies required of business controllers. “Every organization interprets the role differently,” Geurtsen observed, “creating substantial challenges in establishing standardized educational objectives for future professionals.”
The academic framework presented incorporated three foundational pillars: organizational governance theory, digital transformation impacts, and controller role conceptualization. A novel addition to existing scholarship was the concept of ‘knowledge of inertia’—referring to organizational resistance and stagnation that controllers must navigate to implement successful transformations.
Geurtsen’s theoretical approach integrated Simons’ ‘levers of control’ model, advocating for reflective control systems that incorporate social context and organizational culture alongside traditional processes. This comprehensive perspective aims to transform governance from theoretical aspiration to practical implementation, ensuring sustainable organizational improvements.
The address traced the historical evolution of organizational governance, noting the traditional dominance of financial information while acknowledging critiques of this narrow focus. Geurtsen discussed emerging performance measurement frameworks, including Kaplan & Norton’s Balanced Scorecard, and examined contemporary insights regarding behavioral and cultural controls as supplementary management tools.
Looking toward the future, Professor Geurtsen envisioned the business controller as a hybrid professional—combining analytical expertise with sophisticated social skills to navigate complex human dynamics within organizations. This duality, he argued, forms the essential foundation for functioning as both legitimate and effective business partners.
The establishment of this academic chair underscores Suriname’s commitment to advancing professional education and research in governance and control, aiming to develop controllers capable of guiding organizations through increasingly complex and digitalized business environments.





