In a recent public appearance on the *Browne and Browne Show*, Gaston Browne, Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, has publicly stated he will not actively back a potential acquisition of FirstCaribbean International Bank (FCIB) by a domestic financial entity, citing serious risks of excessive consolidation in the country’s banking sector. According to Browne, an undisclosed local bank has already approached his government with an unusual request: to revoke FCIB’s existing banking license, a move that would clear the path for the domestic institution to purchase FCIB’s local operations. The prime minister has chosen not to release the name of the institution that made this request, and no concrete details of the proposed deal—including a formal offer, agreed purchase price, or structured acquisition timeline—have been made public to date. While Browne emphasized that he remains a committed supporter of expanding local ownership across Antigua and Barbuda’s banking industry, he stressed that growing market power among a small cohort of domestic banks would carry dangerous consequences for consumers and market competition. “As much as I’m a proponent for local ownership, I’m very concerned about any further concentration of the market,” he told listeners during the broadcast. Browne also pulled back the curtain on longstanding service quality issues plaguing many of the nation’s local banks, calling out common consumer pain points such as frequently empty automated teller machines, exorbitant service fees, and a widespread reluctance among domestic lenders to issue credit to consumers and small businesses. He warned that allowing further consolidation through the acquisition of FCIB would create large, entrenched financial institutions that face little competitive pressure to upgrade their service standards for customers. Contrary to the push for domestic acquisition, Browne noted that larger multinational banks, such as the Bank of Butterfield, are capable of offering a range of specialized financial services that smaller domestic players are often unable to provide, most notably critical support for trade-related instruments like letters of credit that underpin local business activity. Importantly, the prime minister clarified that his opposition is not an outright block on the deal: he has no intention of legally preventing a domestic institution from moving forward with the acquisition, but he will not campaign for the transaction, use government influence to facilitate it, or provide any active support for the proposal. “As much as I said to them that I would not block them from acquiring it, I would not actively promote it,” he reaffirmed during the program.
博客
-

Baptiste: Saint Lucia rejected four US-proposed third-country transfers
In a public pre-Cabinet briefing held Monday, Saint Lucia’s External Affairs Minister Alva Baptiste has confirmed that the Caribbean nation turned down four of 10 third-country nationals proposed by the United States for transfer under a bilateral temporary relocation agreement, marking the first test of the arrangement between the two nations.
Following the rejection, six approved migrants arrived in Saint Lucia last week. Baptiste disclosed that the new arrivals hold citizenship from nations across Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean, though their exact nationalities remain undisclosed for privacy. Of the six currently in the country, two have already expressed a desire to return to their home countries, with the Saint Lucian government now coordinating with their respective national embassies to coordinate this voluntary repatriation process. The remaining four have stated that they wish to stay in Saint Lucia for the immediate future.
To clarify the terms of the agreement for the public, Baptiste repeatedly emphasized that Saint Lucia maintains full, unconditional discretion to vet and reject any individual the U.S. puts forward for relocation, pushing back against early misinformation that the nation had surrendered this sovereign authority. “In this first case, Saint Lucia did not accept all ten individuals that the US had submitted,” he noted during the briefing.
A third-country national, by definition, refers to an individual deported from one country to a third state that is not their country of origin. Under the two-year temporary agreement between Washington and Castries, Saint Lucia can accept up to 10 third-country nationals per three-month period. Baptiste stressed that the arrangement is not a permanent resettlement program, but a temporary measure to support people facing precarious circumstances.
Addressing widespread public concern over potential risks to national security and public safety that circulated in local discourse following the transfer, Baptiste confirmed that comprehensive government background checks found no evidence any of the six arrivals posed a threat. “They are certainly not criminals as has been portrayed in some circles,” he said, adding that the group are people who have faced extraordinary hardship related to their immigration status in the U.S. and are now seeking a chance to rebuild their lives with temporary safe haven.
The transfer and reception process unfolded without incident, Baptiste confirmed, with multiple Saint Lucian government agencies — including the ministries of External Affairs, Health, Equity, and National Security — coordinating alongside international partners to manage the arrival. All program costs are covered by the U.S. government, with additional operational and logistics support provided by international partners, including assistance for voluntary repatriation. Migrants will remain housed under arrangements managed by the Saint Lucian government and its partners, with voluntary repatriation remaining an open option for any individual who chooses to return home at a later date.
Baptiste also pushed back against criticism that the arrangement would strain the small developing nation’s existing social and economic resources. “We are fully cognisant that as a developing country we have real social and economic challenges, and this government does not minimise them, but our responsibility to the people of Saint Lucia and our responsibility to uphold the principles of human dignity are not competing principles. We can and must do both,” he said.
The first transfer came after months of negotiations between Saint Lucia and U.S. officials to assess the Caribbean nation’s capacity to participate in the program.
Speaking alongside Baptiste on Monday, Saint Lucia Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre — who also currently serves as Chairman of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) — clarified the regional bloc’s position on the agreement. Pierre confirmed that while the arrangement was discussed at the regional level, CARICOM member states retain full sovereign authority to make independent decisions on whether to participate in such programs.
“In terms of political policies, CARICOM member states make their own decisions. There was discussion; people discussed the agreement, but it was left to individual governments to take the decisions that they felt were right and proper,” Pierre said.
CARICOM leaders have previously raised collective concerns about the capacity of small island developing states to manage third-country national transit arrangements. They have stressed that any such agreements must not disrupt regional security or divert critical public resources and services away from member states’ own citizens.
Operationally, the United Nations’ International Organisation for Migration manages on-the-ground implementation of the program in participating countries, while individual national governments retain full authority over all core decisions including admission, legal status, protection, and removal of relocated individuals.
-

Hoe groot is Afrika echt? Waarom de VN stemde om de wereldkaart te veranderen
On September 8, the United Nations General Assembly took a landmark step to address centuries of geographic bias in global mapping, approving a resolution led by African nations that encourages member states to adopt the Equal Earth map projection — a alternative that corrects the size distortions that have minimized the Global South on traditional maps for hundreds of years.
The resolution, which won backing from 164 member states, faces only one opposing vote from the United States, with six Eastern European nations — Serbia, Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, and Ukraine — abstaining from the vote. The core goal of the measure is to promote a more geographically accurate representation of the world’s continents, replacing the widely used Mercator projection, which was originally developed in 1569 by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator for maritime navigation.
For centuries, the Mercator projection’s design has skewed public perception of global landmasses. Created to preserve straight lines for ocean navigation, it exaggerates the size of land masses closer to the poles while shrinking territories near the equator. This distortion leaves northern, wealthier regions appearing far larger than they actually are relative to equatorial and southern nations. For example, on Mercator maps, Africa appears roughly the same size as Greenland, but in reality, Africa is 14 times larger than the Arctic island. In actual area, Africa spans 30.3 million square kilometers — large enough to fit the entire United States, China, India, and most of Europe within its borders. Combined, the four regions disproportionately shrunk by Mercator — Africa, Latin America, South Asia, and Oceania — cover more than 64 million square kilometers, over 40% of the world’s total land area. By contrast, the entire continent of Europe only measures 10.2 million square kilometers.
The Equal Earth projection, launched in 2018 by three cartographers from the Environmental Systems Research Institute, U.S. National Park Service, and Australia’s Monash University, fixes this long-standing bias. Co-creator Bojan Savric explained in a 2025 interview with AFP that the projection preserves the relative size of all continents while retaining accurate representations of their shapes, matching how landmasses appear on a three-dimensional globe.
Togo’s Foreign Minister Robert Dussey, whose country led the resolution effort, emphasized that maps are far more than navigational tools. “Maps shape education, fuel public imagination, and shape collective global perceptions,” he said, adding that the adopted resolution “affirms the African reality” that has been erased and minimized for centuries.
Reactions to the resolution have been largely positive among supporting nations. France, a co-sponsor of the text, has already announced it will abandon the Mercator projection for official use. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot noted that the traditional projection gives the U.S., Russia, and China “disproportionate visual dominance over Africa, Latin America, or Southeast Asia,” while perpetuating the false illusion that Greenland is nearly as large as Africa. “Changing maps will not change the world on its own,” Barrot said. “But correcting a distorted representation is already an act of truth.”
The resolution faced sharp criticism from the U.S. delegation. U.S. representative Yaryna Ferencevych argued that the debate over 16th-century map projections distracts the UN from addressing pressing global issues, claiming the resolution is evidence the body “is losing its credibility.”
Notably, the UN resolution is not legally binding for member states. The world body has stressed it does not ban the Mercator projection or mandate a universal replacement, and instead only encourages governments and international institutions worldwide to adopt the Equal Earth projection as a new standard for more accurate geographic representation.







