博客

BELIZE CITY — An unusual alliance of labor unions and political factions converged outside the Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL) headquarters on January 27, 2026, mounting substantial resistance against the proposed acquisition of Speednet (Smart). What began as a peaceful demonstration escalated into a significant display of public dissent against the multimillion-dollar telecommunications consolidation.

The protest commenced at 8:00 AM with demonstrators quietly lining St. Thomas Street, but within hours swelled to a substantial crowd featuring representatives from multiple influential organizations. The National Trade Union Congress of Belize (NTUCB), Christian Workers Union, Public Service Union, and Belize Energy Workers Union stood alongside United Democratic Party (UDP) supporters—a remarkable coalition transcending traditional political divides.

NTUCB President Ella Waight emphasized the strategic monitoring of BTL’s movements, stating, “We are very respectful people. We are holding the peace. But we hope we can continue holding the peace. As long as they do the right thing and don’t do anything today, it will remain like that.”

The demonstration gained urgency following rumors that BTL’s board would convene to finalize the acquisition decision. Notably, the anticipated meeting had been canceled the previous evening, though protesters maintained their vigil. Police established a secure perimeter around the compound while employees watched uneasily from behind office windows.

Union leaders articulated specific objections to the merger. Christian Workers Union President Leonora Flowers referenced historical precedents: “There is too much at stake here for Belizeans to just sit back and watch it go through. We have had this before in the past with this same administration.” Public Service Union President Dean Flowers challenged national complacency: “We need to understand that we are not a country of sheep and this sheepish lifestyle and behavior that we have exhibited needs to be done away with.”

Adding theatrical protest, Wave Morning Show host Alfonso Noble appeared in a full bacon costume—a pointed critique aimed at BTL Chairman Markhelm Lizarraga, who owns a meat shop. Noble declared, “They are taking public money to buy a private company and there is absolutely no justification whatsoever.”

Former employees joined the protest demanding outstanding severance payments, questioning how BTL could pursue a massive acquisition while allegedly failing to meet existing financial obligations. Emily Turner, past president of the Belize Communication Workers Union, noted the reduced acquisition price: “Remember they started at wanting to acquire three or four companies for a hundred and eighty million. So a hundred million has dropped out. So we don’t think there should be any delay in BTL having the money to cover this severance.”

The event signals deepening concerns about telecommunications consolidation in Belize, with the broader debate about the nation’s digital future remaining decidedly unresolved.

Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL) has issued a forceful condemnation following a morning protest that saw demonstrators forcibly enter the company’s private compound. In an official statement released January 27, 2026, the telecommunications provider characterized the incident as unlawful trespassing that created unsafe conditions for both staff and customers.

The company revealed that while a scheduled board meeting was occurring on premises, the gathering was unrelated to the proposed Speednet acquisition that allegedly motivated the protest. Instead, the meeting focused exclusively on internal human-resource matters stemming from a 2025 judicial decision.

BTL asserted that the protest intentionally disrupted normal business operations in what appeared to be an attempt to pressure board members into relinquishing their governance responsibilities—a course of action the company firmly rejects. Describing the events as “regrettable and counterproductive,” BTL emphasized its zero-tolerance policy toward intimidation or harassment of directors and employees.

The telecommunications firm is now collaborating with law enforcement authorities to address the security breach. In a significant escalation of rhetoric, BTL warned that such incidents extend beyond mere business disruption, potentially jeopardizing national economic security by undermining stable corporate operations.

A significant leadership crisis is unfolding at Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL), the nation’s state-owned telecommunications provider, as internal pressures escalate against Chairman Markhelm Lizarraga. The Belize Communications Workers for Justice has publicly demanded Lizarraga’s immediate resignation, citing a complete breakdown of trust, transparency, and corporate accountability under his stewardship.

The controversy centers on two critical issues that have eroded confidence in BTL’s leadership. First, the company’s refusal to fully implement a Caribbean Court of Justice ruling mandating that severance payments be treated separately from pension benefits and distributed to all eligible former employees. This legal stance has created substantial tension between management and workforce representatives.

Second, the union has identified what it characterizes as a glaring conflict of interest in BTL’s proposed acquisition of Speednet, further complicating the governance landscape. The situation has reached a tipping point with former BCWU President Michael Augustus revealing that Lizarraga previously advocated for these very worker benefits while in opposition to the United Democratic Party government.

Augustus recounted Lizarraga’s earlier position: “He had a meeting in our office against then the United Democratic Party and its government. And was telling us that all these same things that we are demanding, including severance, was due to us.” This historical context underscores the union’s allegations of hypocrisy and conflict of interest, with Augustus concluding that Lizarraga “need to” resign from his position of authority.

The growing discontent signals deeper structural issues within Belize’s telecommunications sector and raises questions about corporate governance standards in state-owned enterprises. As calls for resignation intensify, all stakeholders await BTL’s response to these serious allegations that threaten to destabilize the organization’s leadership framework.

A significant internal division has emerged within Belize Telemedia Limited (BTL) between former employees and current staff regarding the company’s proposed consolidation with Speednet. The Belize Communication Workers for Justice (BCWJ), representing ex-employees, has publicly opposed the acquisition, while an internal company poll reveals overwhelming support (79%) among current employees for the merger.

The situation is further complicated by the conspicuous silence of the Belize Communication Workers Union (BCWU), which represents current staff, regarding former workers’ ongoing severance dispute. This silence persists despite a definitive ruling from the Caribbean Court of Justice in favor of the former employees. Multiple attempts to obtain comments from current BCWU leadership have been unsuccessful.

Two former BCWU presidents provided insight into the union’s cautious stance. Emily Turner suggested that current union leadership faces legitimate fears of workplace victimization should they speak out, noting that corporate restructuring measures “will surely affect them” based on historical precedents.

Michael Augustus offered a more nuanced perspective, acknowledging potential disappointment in the union’s silence while expressing understanding of their strategic position. He warned about “vindictive people” in BTL’s upper management who might retaliate against current employees supporting the severance fight, potentially even threatening pension benefits. Augustus maintained hope that internal support remains available when critically needed, noting “we still have some plug pullers in there.”

The growing chasm within the BTL organization highlights the complex dynamics between corporate consolidation, worker solidarity, and the very real fears of retaliation that silence union representation during critical negotiations.