分类： society

Christopher Boodram, the sole survivor of the 2022 Paria Fuel diving tragedy, has filed an amended claim in the High Court, accusing Paria Fuel Trading Co Ltd and LMCS Ltd of negligence in the incident that claimed the lives of four of his colleagues. Boodram, 39, sought permission to revise his statement of case on October 24, following new medical reports diagnosing him with post-concussion syndrome, spinal injuries, and chronic neurological and sexual dysfunction resulting from the accident. His application was supported by an orthopedic report from Dr. Rishi Jagdeo, dated October 22.

The tragic event occurred on February 25, 2022, when Boodram and four other divers—Kazim Ali Jr, Yusuf Henry, Rishi Nagassar, and Fyzal Kurban—were performing maintenance on a 30-inch underwater pipeline at Berth 6, Pointe-a-Pierre. They were suddenly sucked into the pipeline by a powerful differential pressure event known as Delta P. Boodram, who spent nearly four hours trapped in the dark, oil-filled pipeline, was the only one to survive.

In his claim, Boodram alleges that both Paria and LMCS failed to identify and mitigate the risk of a Delta P event, provide proper safety equipment, or establish an emergency response plan. He also accuses Paria of obstructing rescue efforts by volunteers and LMCS divers. Boodram’s legal team, led by Senior Counsel Anand Ramlogan, argues that both companies breached their duty of care. They cite findings from the commission of enquiry (CoE) report issued by chairman Jerome Lynch, KC, in November 2023, which highlighted ambiguous instructions and poor oversight by both companies as contributing factors to the deaths.

Boodram, who was rescued by diver Ronald Ramoutar after defying a no-dive order, continues to suffer from severe physical and psychological injuries, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, speech impairment, and an 80% permanent partial disability. He is seeking general and special damages, including loss of earnings estimated at $438,927.45, as well as aggravated damages for emotional distress and alleged mistreatment post-incident.

The court has ordered Boodram to file and serve his amended statement of case by November 10, with the defendants’ amended defences due by November 20. The case is set for a management conference on May 5, 2026, presided over by Justice Christopher Sieuchand. Separate claims by Vanessa Kussie, the widow of diver Rishi Nagassar, and ancillary proceedings between LMCS and Paria are also part of the matter, with each company attempting to shift full liability to the other.

LMCS has consistently denied responsibility, asserting that Paria was to blame for both the unsafe conditions and the failure to conduct a timely rescue. The company’s lawyers argue that Paria is guilty of gross negligence based on evidence presented to the CoE. Meanwhile, both companies and their executives face separate OSHA charges and ongoing proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Attorney Prakash Ramadhar, representing the families of Kurban and Henry, has proposed an ex gratia payment of $5 million to each family. Former Prime Minister Stuart Young had announced a $1 million ex gratia payment for each family and Boodram before the April 28 general election, but as of November, the payments remain unresolved due to legal and logistical issues. Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar has expressed commitment to compensation but emphasized the need to address legal complications first.

The murder of Sylvan ‘Lawah’ Boodan, a 58-year-old businessman from Jeffers Crossing, Tabaquite Road, has left the community of Rio Claro in shock. Boodan was fatally shot on the morning of November 3 at R. Baldeosingh Services Ltd (RBSL), a construction company along San Pedro Road, Poole Village. While police investigators have yet to determine a motive, relatives suspect the killing may be linked to an unresolved obeah debt.

Boodan, who owned Gloria Bar on the ground floor of his residence, also worked as a straightener and painter at RBSL. Reports indicate that on the day of the incident, he was called out by name by a man near his car. After a brief exchange, a single gunshot was heard, and the gunman fled the scene. Boodan collapsed and died in front of his car.

A relative revealed that the family believes the murder could be connected to a dispute involving unpaid services to an ‘obeah man’ earlier this year. The dispute reportedly began in July when the alleged spiritual advisor claimed Boodan owed money for services performed against a woman. The woman allegedly reported an ‘obeah death threat’ to the police in August but did not receive a receipt for her complaint.

Boodan lived on the same compound with his ex-wife, Gloria, and other relatives. The couple, who were divorced, had no children together. Their divorce settlement was finalized in court on September 26. Relatives described Boodan as a hardworking and respected man with no known enemies in the area.

A villager who witnessed the aftermath of the shooting reported seeing a masked man running along San Pedro Road with what appeared to be a gun. The villager expressed disappointment that police did not immediately pursue the suspect. Officers later conducted a search but failed to locate the killer.

Residents of San Pedro expressed disbelief over the incident, stating that such violence is uncommon in their community. Investigations by the Rio Claro police station, Eastern Division units, and the Homicide Bureau of Investigations (Region II) are ongoing.

Last Friday, the nation was thrown into a state of widespread panic as unverified rumors of a potential attack or war spread rapidly across social media and traditional news outlets. This led to the premature closure of schools, businesses, shops, and offices, causing massive traffic congestion on roads and highways. Grocery stores saw a surge in panic buying, with items like toilet paper becoming highly sought-after. Deputy Commissioner of Police Junior Benjamin revealed that the police executive, relying on information from these platforms, decided to cancel the leave of all officers. This reaction to unverified information highlights a concerning dependence on media sources for critical decision-making. The incident raises questions about the role of social media in spreading misinformation and the adequacy of the police’s response mechanisms in such scenarios.