分类： politics

In a striking development that has sent shockwaves through international diplomatic circles, former Dominican UN Ambassador Crispin Gregoire has issued an urgent appeal for Caribbean Community (CARICOM) leaders to break their silence regarding Venezuela’s escalating political crisis. This follows the dramatic capture of President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces in what Gregoire describes as a meticulously executed operation that has left Venezuela’s military and political establishment in disarray.

Gregoire, expressing profound disappointment with what he characterizes as the region’s ‘timid’ response, emphasized that Caribbean leaders must demonstrate unity and engage directly with Washington during this critical juncture. The former ambassador revealed astonishing operational details, indicating that U.S. intelligence had successfully penetrated Maduro’s innermost security circle, allegedly relocating family members of his personal guards to the United States under new identities prior to the operation.

The actual extraction, conducted by Delta Force operatives, reportedly unfolded with military precision—completing Maduro’s seizure along with his wife within a remarkable twelve-minute window. This operation has triggered profound legal and political questions regarding sovereignty violations and the bypassing of conventional diplomatic protocols.

Maduro now confronts an extensive 700-page indictment in U.S. courts that portrays him as a central figure in international drug trafficking networks. Gregoire drew compelling parallels to the case of Panama’s Manuel Noriega, raising fundamental questions about the legitimacy of trying a foreign head of state apprehended under such controversial circumstances.

The ambassador further highlighted the severe destabilization risks within Venezuela, where armed factions including Colombian groups and Maduro’s colectivos militia remain heavily armed and operational. Compounding regional concerns are emerging reports suggesting possible connections between Caribbean politicians and Maduro’s alleged narcotics network, with recent cocaine seizures in Dominica and investigations into energy officials fueling speculation about regional involvement.

Gregoire’s central argument maintains that CARICOM’s continued silence represents a dangerous abdication of regional leadership that could ultimately compromise the Caribbean’s political sovereignty and international standing. He criticized regional leaders for what he perceives as their subdued response to the Trump administration’s actions, suggesting they have been ‘whipped into submission’ for political survival.

This crisis transcends Venezuela’s immediate future, presenting a critical test of the Caribbean’s ability to assert its geopolitical interests amid great power intervention. Gregoire’s statement serves as a potent reminder that in moments of international upheaval, neutrality carries significant consequences.

A recent U.S. military operation targeting Venezuelan territory has generated significant geopolitical repercussions across the Western Hemisphere, with unconfirmed reports suggesting the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his spouse by American forces. This development has reignited longstanding debates about sovereignty, foreign intervention, and great-power competition in Latin America.

The operation represents an escalation of Washington’s prolonged pressure campaign against Caracas, which has historically centered on allegations of narcotics trafficking, corruption, and governance deficiencies. Recent months witnessed increased U.S. naval deployments and targeted strikes against vessels suspected of drug trafficking operations in Caribbean and eastern Pacific waters.

Contrary to popular narratives suggesting energy motivations驱动 behind American actions, analytical evidence contradicts the theory that the United States seeks to control Venezuela’s substantial oil reserves. The U.S. currently maintains energy self-sufficiency through domestic production and exports, while Venezuelan crude requires specialized refining infrastructure that would demand substantial investment and modernization efforts.

A more plausible explanation centers on geopolitical considerations, as Venezuela’s deepening alliances with nations designated as adversarial by Washington—including China, Russia, and Iran—has created strategic concerns about great-power competition extending into America’s traditional sphere of influence. The military campaign appears primarily focused on countering perceived hostile influences rather than securing energy resources.

Regional responses have revealed profound political divisions across Latin America and the Caribbean. Multiple left-leaning governments, including those of Brazil, Mexico, and Chile, have vehemently condemned the operations as violations of international law and sovereignty, advocating instead for diplomatic solutions. Smaller Caribbean nations expressed concerns about potential refugee crises, economic disruption, and forced political alignment.

Notably, some regional voices, including Dominican ceremonial President H.E. Sylvanie Burton, have characterized U.S. actions as ‘bullying behavior toward smaller nations,’ reflecting deep-seated sensitivities about power asymmetry and interventionism. While limited cooperation on counternarcotics operations continues with some Caribbean states, most governments have emphasized the primacy of peaceful conflict resolution and respect for national sovereignty.

The Cuban government has issued a forceful condemnation of the United States’ military intervention in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores on January 3. In an official declaration characterized by strong rhetoric, Cuban authorities denounced the operation as an unlawful act of aggression that violates international law and the United Nations Charter.

Cuba’s statement expressed unwavering solidarity with Venezuela’s Bolivarian government and endorsed Vice President Delcy Rodríguez’s demand for proof regarding Maduro’s safety and whereabouts. The Caribbean nation, a longstanding ally of Venezuela, pledged support for Caracas’ right to defend its sovereignty against what it termed ‘unwarranted foreign interference.’

The condemnation framed the military action as part of a broader campaign against Venezuela that intensified in September 2025 with US naval deployments in the Caribbean Sea. Cuban officials characterized these maneuvers as based on ‘false pretexts and unfounded accusations lacking any evidence.’

Invoking historical context, the statement suggested the operation reflects the Monroe Doctrine’s legacy, aiming to establish hegemonic control over Latin America’s natural resources and political systems. Cuban authorities warned of potential repercussions and placed direct responsibility for any casualties on US leadership, including former President Donald Trump and senior officials.

The declaration referenced the 2014 Havana Declaration, which established Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace, and called upon regional governments to honor this commitment. Cuba urged international condemnation of what it described as ‘state terrorism,’ arguing that such actions threaten global peace and challenge the sovereignty of all Latin American nations.

Concluding with revolutionary fervor, the statement affirmed Cuba’s preparedness to ‘give even our own blood’ for Venezuela and echoed historical slogans: ‘Homeland or Death. We Shall Overcome!’