分类: politics

  • Judge Recuses Himself in Stroll v. Global Bank Case as Matter Nears Conclusion

    Judge Recuses Himself in Stroll v. Global Bank Case as Matter Nears Conclusion

    In a sudden twist that has delayed a long-awaited resolution in one of the business world’s most closely watched legal battles, Justice Renee Williams has stepped down from presiding over the high-stakes dispute between prominent businessman Jack Stroll and the Global Bank of Commerce — a development that comes as the case appeared to be on the cusp of a final decision.

    Williams notified legal teams representing both parties that he would no longer lead the proceedings, offering only unspecified personal reasons as justification for the recusal. No additional details about the circumstances behind his departure have been released to the public, leaving court observers and stakeholders to speculate about what prompted the last-minute change.

    Following Williams’ exit, judicial administrators have reassigned the entire case to Justice Birnie Stephenson. To give the newly appointed judge sufficient time to familiarize himself with the complex history of the dispute, all proceedings have been adjourned until July 23. Court officials have also issued a formal order requiring legal counsel to compile a complete, chronological timeline of all past actions and filings related to the case, to streamline Stephenson’s review process. In the interim, the court has confirmed it will not accept any new motions or additional applications from either side as it sorts out the next steps for moving the dispute toward resolution.

  • United Workers Party mourns passing of former minister Ian Pinard

    United Workers Party mourns passing of former minister Ian Pinard

    The Caribbean nation of Dominica is in national mourning this week following the unexpected death of former senior government official Ian Pinard on Friday, April 17, 2026. The United Workers Party (UWP), the political group with which Pinard was affiliated, has released an official statement extending deep sympathy to the late statesman’s family, friends and loved ones after his sudden passing.

    In the party’s public message, representatives confirmed that the entire UWP organization stands with the Dominican people in grieving Pinard’s loss. “The party joins the nation in mourning his passing and offers thoughts and prayers to all those grieving during this difficult time,” the statement reads.

    Details released by the government of Dominica outline Pinard’s decades-long commitment to public service, most notably his two terms as Parliamentary Representative for the Soufriere constituency. His elected office covered four coastal communities across the southern part of the island: Soufriere, Scotts Head, Gallion and Pointe Michel.

    Pinard launched his political career in national government after winning his first parliamentary election in 2005. Almost a decade later, he secured a second term in the 2014 general election. Throughout his tenure as a people’s representative, he consistently advocated for the needs and interests of his constituency at the national level, pushing for infrastructure investment and community development projects that benefited local residents.

    Beyond his role as an elected representative, Pinard held two key appointed positions in Dominican government. He began his executive service as a Parliamentary Secretary within the Ministry of Education, where he supported policy implementation for the island’s public education system. He was later promoted to the cabinet post of Minister for Public Works and Ports.

    In this senior cabinet role, Pinard oversaw all island-wide road infrastructure projects and national port operations. His leadership was critical to the ongoing management and maintenance of Dominica’s core transportation networks, a responsibility he carried steadily even during periods of national recovery and post-disaster reconstruction following extreme weather events common to the Caribbean region.

  • Trump Warns of “Bombing” Iran Likely if Talks Fail

    Trump Warns of “Bombing” Iran Likely if Talks Fail

    With a critical Wednesday ceasefire deadline rapidly approaching, the United States and Iran stand just one misstep away from a resumption of open military conflict, according to new remarks from former president and current U.S. leadership figure Donald Trump. In an exclusive interview with CNBC, Trump openly warned that military strikes on Iran are the most likely outcome if negotiations fail to produce a breakthrough, stating that preparing for bombing operations is the strongest negotiating position Washington can hold.

    Trump added that U.S. military forces are fully prepared and eager to carry out combat operations if ordered, ratcheting up already heightened tensions between the two nations. The hardline comments come as Washington scrambles to organize last-ditch diplomatic talks in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad, a plan that remains in limbo as Iranian officials have not yet confirmed their participation, multiple U.S. media outlets including CNN report.

    Per insider sources familiar with the negotiation plans, U.S. Senator JD Vance is expected to lead the American delegation alongside a cohort of senior national security officials, while Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf has been tapped to head Tehran’s negotiating team. But Iranian government officials have pushed back on this framing, publicly insisting that no Iranian delegation has even arrived in Islamabad for talks as of this reporting.

    Compounding the uncertainty around diplomacy, Trump has explicitly ruled out extending the existing ceasefire, calling a deadline extension “highly unlikely.” The refusal to extend the truce has put extreme pressure on negotiators before formal talks have even begun, leaving the entire diplomatic process on fragile ground.

    Off the negotiating table, hostilities between the two nations are already intensifying. The U.S. Pentagon recently confirmed that U.S. military personnel boarded a sanctions-targeted tanker in international waters, an operation that comes just days after U.S. forces seized an Iranian-owned cargo vessel. Iran has fiercely condemned these actions as outright piracy, and has issued explicit warnings that it will carry out retaliatory measures in response.

    At the core of the ongoing standoff is control over the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic global chokepoint that carries roughly 20 percent of the world’s daily oil supply. Global energy markets have already felt the impact of rising tensions, with oil prices seeing consistent upward volatility over the past weeks since the current conflict cycle began.

    While U.S. officials frame their military and economic pressure as a tool to force Iran to the negotiating table, Iranian leaders have signaled they hold unexpected new leverage in any potential military confrontation. The hardening positions from both sides have left global observers fearing that ongoing diplomatic efforts are not a genuine attempt to avoid war, but rather a preliminary step before open conflict resumes.

  • Controversial bill ‘not going to be dealt with today’ — PM

    Controversial bill ‘not going to be dealt with today’ — PM

    Prime Minister Godwin Friday of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has confirmed that controversial proposed amendments to the national constitution and electoral law will not face debate during Tuesday’s scheduled sitting of the House of Assembly, marking his first public response to opposition warnings about the proposed changes.

    The amendments, formally tabled as the Constitution of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (Amendment) Bill 2026 and the Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill 2026, were placed on the Order Paper one week prior as required by parliamentary procedure. In an interview with the state-run Agency for Public Information (API), Friday, who also serves as Minister of Legal Affairs, explained that while all legislation listed for the sitting holds importance, not all require immediate action.

    Opposition Leader Ralph Gonsalves, head of the Unity Labour Party (ULP), had previously raised public alarm over the bills, claiming the ruling New Democratic Party (NDP) intended to rush all three readings of the amendments through during Tuesday’s session. Opposition figures have further alleged the changes are being pursued as a political safeguard amid two ongoing election petitions set to be heard by the High Court this July. Those petitions were filed by ULP members Carlos Williams and Luke Browne, who are challenging the eligibility of Friday and Foreign Affairs Minister Dwight Fitzgerald Bramble to contest the November 2025 general election. The challengers argue that both lawmakers qualify as dual citizens of Canada, acquired through voluntary action, which violates existing electoral eligibility rules. Friday has held the Northern Grenadines parliamentary seat since 2001, while Bramble has represented East Kingstown since 2020; both held Canadian citizenship before their first elections, and the pair have defeated their ULP challengers in multiple previous contests.

    Friday acknowledged that the amendments, which are designed to clarify the legal definition of a “foreign power or state”, have sparked widespread public attention. While the bills will be formally introduced during Tuesday’s sitting, they will instead be referred to a parliamentary select committee to allow for extended public input, a process Friday says will ensure inclusive, informed decision-making. “These are matters that affect people’s rights and impact broad swathes of the population,” he noted. “We will not rush this. We will bring in broad public involvement to make a decision at the appropriate time. The public interest demands a thorough, collaborative process, and we are committed to delivering that.” Unnamed government sources have also confirmed to iWitness News that no vote on the amendments will be held until the ongoing election petitions are resolved by the courts.

    Instead of advancing the controversial amendments, Tuesday’s sitting will prioritize legislation directly impacting the daily lives of ordinary Vincentians, particularly low-paid public sector workers. Two key bills on the agenda address gaps in the national pension system: the Daily Paid and Minor Salaried Officers (Compassionate Gratuity) Bill 2026, which Friday will table, and the Pensions (Amendment) Bill 2026, set to be introduced by Deputy Prime Minister and Public Service Minister St. Clair Leacock. Currently, public sector workers who retire at age 60 are forced to wait until age 65 to access their pensions, with support previously handled only on an ad-hoc basis by the Cabinet. Friday explained the new legislation will formalize a permanent legal framework to remedy this gap, providing critical relief to some of the lowest earners in public service.

    Two smaller pieces of legislation are also scheduled for full passage during Tuesday’s sitting. The Illiterates Protection (Amendment) Bill 2026 expands the pool of people eligible to witness signatures for voters who cannot read or write, a change designed to improve access to electoral processes for marginalized communities. The second bill, the Advance Passenger Information and Passenger Name Record Bill 2026, fulfills Saint Vincent and the Grenadines’ obligations under CARICOM regional policy.

    In addition to legislative business, Tuesday’s agenda includes a motion sponsored by government senator Chelsea Alexander to advance the establishment of a national development bank, a key campaign promise from the NDP ahead of its landslide 14-1 victory over the ULP in the November 2025 general election. Friday, who also holds the finance portfolio, expressed strong enthusiasm for the project, noting it will fill a critical gap in access to capital for underserved groups across the country. “Regular commercial banks often turn away small borrowers with modest projects,” he explained. “This development bank will serve ordinary people: small business owners looking to expand their shops, fishers needing to buy new engines, food processors looking to scale up their labeling and bottling operations. We will debate this motion today, and we plan to introduce formal founding legislation later this year to get this institution up and running.”

  • Bain seeks to seal court records in $90,000 dispute

    Bain seeks to seal court records in $90,000 dispute

    As the Bahamas prepares for its upcoming general election, a high-stakes civil financial dispute involving one of the country’s opposition political leaders has moved back into the public spotlight. Lincoln Bain, head of the Coalition of Independents and a candidate in the approaching vote, is pushing to seal court records related to a 16-year-long $90,000 unresolved debt dispute — though his first attempt to secure the sealing order fell short earlier this month over a procedural misstep.

    The initial request for a sealing order was raised orally on April 1, 2026, during a Notice to Attend Examination hearing, with attorney Tanya Wright making the ask on Bain’s behalf. Travette Pyfrom, the attorney representing claimant Zinnia Rolle, immediately objected to the informal move, noting that no formal written application had been submitted to the court and that the proceeding was scheduled to be held in open, public court.

    While justices indicated they held no principled opposition to sealing the records in this matter, they confirmed they could not issue a ruling without a properly filed formal application before the court during the hearing. Court administration officials later confirmed that Bain’s legal team only submitted the formal written application one day after the hearing, on April 2, 2026. As a result, the request was not taken up for consideration during the April 1 proceedings, no sealing order has been granted to date, and all case documents remain accessible as part of the public court record.

    Details included in the submitted application outline Bain’s core arguments for sealing the dispute. As a prominent public figure running for public office, Bain’s legal team argues that confidential information shared during a closed-door chambers hearing held on March 13, 2026, was improperly leaked to the public and shared widely on the social media platform Facebook, despite explicit court warnings against disclosing confidential proceedings. The filing asserts the leak could only have originated from a person in attendance at the closed March hearing, and adds that Rolle has failed to appear at multiple court hearings over the past several years, leaving her potentially unaware of court-imposed confidentiality rules. Beyond the sealing request, the application also asks the court to require Rolle to attend all future hearings in person, unless explicitly exempted by the court or a mutual agreement between both legal teams. Bain has submitted a sworn affidavit in support of his request, court records confirm.

    The underlying dispute stretches back to a failed investment deal first struck in 2010. Rolle secured a Supreme Court judgment against Bain and his company in December 2021, ordering the defendants to repay $64,000 in outstanding funds. The ruling was upheld on appeal by the Bahamas Court of Appeal, and when the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council — the region’s highest court of appeal — declined to hear Bain’s final appeal in October 2025, the court awarded Rolle an additional $26,000 in legal costs, bringing the total unpaid judgment to $90,000.

    To date, the full $90,000 remains unpaid, and court-ordered enforcement actions to collect the outstanding sum have ramped up in recent months. As part of these enforcement proceedings, Bain was previously ordered to appear before Supreme Court Registrar Renaldo Toote to answer questions about his assets and financial status.

    The case has added new scrutiny to Bain’s public financial disclosures, which he submitted as a candidate in the upcoming May general election. In those mandatory declarations, Bain reported a personal net worth exceeding $1.5 million, and listed his total outstanding liabilities at just $85,000 — a figure that nearly matches the $90,000 unpaid judgment at the center of the ongoing dispute.

  • Residents of Whitehouse are not being targeted, says Mayor Vernon

    Residents of Whitehouse are not being targeted, says Mayor Vernon

    In a recent community gathering held in the coastal fishing neighborhood of Whitehouse, St James, Jamaica, Mayor of Montego Bay Councillor Richard Vernon has openly dismissed widespread rumors that the St James Municipal Corporation is specifically targeting local residents for unauthorised construction enforcement. The meeting brought together local leaders and community members to address a range of pressing local concerns, from public safety and solid waste collection to public health and long-awaited land formalisation efforts.

    Vernon stressed that cease-and-desist orders for unapproved construction have been issued to property owners across hundreds of communities throughout St James over the past 12 months, covering both high-income established neighborhoods and unregulated informal settlements. “There is zero credibility to the claim that we are singling out Whitehouse,” Vernon stated in an official press release published by the municipal corporation on Wednesday. “We have taken action in Bogue Village, Rosevale, Rhyne Park, Westgate Hills, Cornwall Courts and more. This isn’t just for informal developments either — even homeowners in formal communities are served notices when they build extensions, add new structures or make major modifications without securing the required legal approvals.”

    As the parish’s official local planning authority, Vernon explained that upholding construction regulations is a core responsibility of the municipal corporation. All development projects must align with the island’s official approved development order, he noted, adding that structured planning is critical not just for regulatory compliance, but to prevent unauthorised breaches and ensure all developments meet the standards required by Jamaican regulatory agencies.

    When pressed on why the formalisation push for Whitehouse is happening now, Vernon framed the timing as a proactive step aligned with Montego Bay’s ongoing regional growth. “This initiative doesn’t cost residents anything beyond the standard fees associated with securing official land titles,” he said. “The St James Municipal Corporation is partnering with relevant national agencies to make this regularisation process happen, and it’s all for the benefit of Whitehouse’s residents. Getting this done now will allow Whitehouse to integrate smoothly into Montego Bay’s wider development plans for the future.”

    The mayor also firmly rejected speculation that the corporation’s actions in Whitehouse are politically motivated, emphasizing that the entire effort is rooted in protecting residents’ interests. “This is a completely non-political move with one clear goal: to ensure these lands stay in the hands of Whitehouse’s hardworking residents, and that every resident gets an official land title. A title gives you power — it gives you security of tenure that can’t be taken away,” he said. The cease-and-desist notices were only issued to enforce orderly development across the community, he added.

    In the coming weeks, the municipal corporation will partner with Jamaica’s National Land Agency and GeoLand Titling to conduct on-the-ground investigations to verify the legitimate current owners of all parcels in Whitehouse, before completing the legal steps to transfer full property ownership into residents’ names.

    “Over the course of this project, we’ve done extensive research to confirm who the rightful owners are, and we’re ready to move forward with transferring these lands to the current legitimate residents who have built this community,” Vernon told attendees. “Owving your own piece of Jamaica with official legal documentation gives you the power to access financing from banks and carry out future development legally — that’s a game-changer for this community.”

    As Montego Bay continues to experience population and economic growth, the municipal corporation has a duty to ensure all construction follows national building codes and legal requirements, Vernon said. Multiple long-established informal communities across St James, including Norwood, Rose Heights and Barrett Town, have already completed the formalisation process, and Whitehouse is next in line. “Residents have occupied and built this vibrant community here for decades,” he noted. “This effort is all about formalising the area, opening up a clear path for residents to get official building permits for future construction, and we’ve brought on expert partners to support the community every step of the way. We’re here to work with you, not against you.”

    In an update on a high-profile local case, Vernon also announced that a compromise has been reached with the owner of Snappaz, a popular local seafood restaurant operating in an unauthorised building in Whitehouse, following a lengthy court battle. The court had originally ordered the full demolition of the structure and removal of all debris, due to its location posing a potential risk to air traffic at nearby Sangster International Airport.

    Recognizing that the restaurant is a major local employer that supports the Whitehouse community’s local economy, the municipal corporation opened negotiations with owner and operator Milton Russell. Under the agreed compromise, Russell will carry out targeted modifications to the building in the near term that will address the air safety concerns, eliminating the need for full demolition.

    This report was compiled by Trevion Manning, Damion Brown and Mayor Richard Vernon.

  • Paulwell urges gov’t to stop the ‘PR’ and get on with oil exploration

    Paulwell urges gov’t to stop the ‘PR’ and get on with oil exploration

    KINGSTON, Jamaica — In a pointed address during Tuesday’s 2026/27 Sectoral Debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, opposition energy spokesperson Phillip Paulwell, a former energy minister under the previous People’s National Party (PNP) administration, has publicly challenged the ruling government to set aside empty public relations and force United Oil and Gas to uphold the binding terms of its Jamaican oil exploration licence.

  • Mideast war ‘starting to weaken Europe’, says Erdogan

    Mideast war ‘starting to weaken Europe’, says Erdogan

    ANKARA, Turkey – In a high-stakes diplomatic exchange on Wednesday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a stark warning to German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier: the ongoing US-Israeli military confrontation against Iran is already beginning to erode Europe’s economic and political stability. A formal statement released by Erdogan’s office detailed the pointed remarks delivered during the bilateral meeting, where the Turkish leader emphasized the urgent need for a peace-first approach to de-escalate tensions spreading across the Middle East. Erdogan stressed that the conflict, which is centered in the immediate region surrounding Turkey, is not contained to the Middle East — its ripple effects are already weakening European foundations. If global and regional leaders continue to prioritize confrontation over negotiated solutions, the eventual harm inflicted by the standoff will reach far beyond the Middle East, leaving Europe with irreversible damage that will take decades to repair, Erdogan told his German counterpart. The remarks mark one of the clearest warnings yet from a major NATO leader about the cross-continental spillover risks of escalating tensions between Iran and the US-Israeli bloc, highlighting growing divisions within the alliance over how to approach the volatile situation in the Middle East.

  • OVERREACH!

    OVERREACH!

    A routine ethics hearing at Jamaica’s Parliament descended into fractious internal debate on Tuesday, as the Ethics Committee found itself in uncharted procedural waters, unable to resolve a fundamental dispute over its authority to recall sitting Member of Parliament Dennis Gordon of St Andrew East Central. What had been billed as a session where the media would hear testimony from Gordon instead devolved into a tense, wide-ranging debate over whether the committee has the legal standing to revisit a matter already finalized by the full House of Representatives.

    At the core of the standoff is the committee’s earlier recommendation on Gordon’s exemption application, which was already approved by Parliament. Newly surfaced public information has cast doubt on the accuracy of disclosures Gordon submitted as part of that original application, prompting some committee members to push for a second invitation for Gordon to appear to answer questions.

    Committee chair Marlene Malahoo Forte defended the effort to reconvene Gordon, framing the request as a matter of core procedural fairness. She argued that Gordon deserves a formal opportunity to respond to the new allegations before the committee draws any final conclusions. But after Gordon rejected the invitation to attend, the debate quickly shifted to the unresolved question of whether the committee retains any jurisdiction over the case once the House has acted on its original recommendation.

    Opposition MP Anthony Hylton, an attorney representing St Andrew Western, was among the most prominent voices calling for the jurisdictional question to be settled before any further action. Hylton emphasized that the committee cannot overstep the boundaries laid out in parliamentary rules, warning that the body’s authority is not unlimited. He pointedly raised the legal doctrine of functus officio, which holds that an official body has exhausted its mandate once it has completed its assigned task on a matter. “The fundamental issue for any committee has first to rest on its jurisdiction to address the matter,” Hylton said. “Our committees are not all-powerful; they are specific, they are limited to the mandates that are given to them, and we can’t do things ‘because it’s nice’.”

    While acknowledging the unprecedented complexity of the situation, Malahoo Forte pushed back against the argument that the committee must drop the matter. She stressed that the body cannot simply ignore new concerns about the integrity of the information that formed the basis of its original recommendation to the House. She also expressed deep discomfort with Gordon’s outright refusal to appear, arguing that the committee has an ethical obligation to examine whether a sitting MP’s rejection of its invitation is appropriate under parliamentary rules.

    “The ethical issue is not so much about what is happening in accounts, but is in relation to the truthfulness of answers provided to the committee which then grounded the recommendation of the committee to the House,” Malahoo Forte said. “So, again, it requires sensitivity, it requires fairness, it requires some reflection.” She added that the tone of Gordon’s rejection letter sat poorly with her, noting that the inquiry is not an attempt at political retaliation: “This is not about witch-hunting anyone, it’s not about pointing fingers at anyone, but it just does not sit well with me.”

    Gordon’s rejection of the invitation left little room for compromise. In his formal note to the committee, he wrote: “Good day, be advised that I will not attend any such sitting. This is overreaching the committee’s mandate. It has no jurisdiction or authority to summon me without an express referral from the full Parliament.”

    Committee member Natalie Neita Garvey, MP for St Catherine North Central, echoed calls for caution, highlighting the need to balance the committee’s mandate to uphold good governance with protections for the individual rights of the MP under scrutiny. Garvey argued that the committee should have clarified its procedural standing before extending a summons to Gordon, and that the body must respect Gordon’s decision to assert his rights under existing rules. “There could have been, from this committee, a clear request as to how we should proceed prior to summoning the member back here in an effort to make sure that we are protecting him as well as this House and this committee,” Garvey said.

    As the debate wrapped up without agreement, Malahoo Forte acknowledged that the impasse exposes deeper procedural challenges the committee will likely face in future ethics inquiries. With no immediate path to resolution, members voted unanimously to refer the entire question to the full House of Representatives for formal guidance before moving forward.

    The jurisdictional dispute has already been backed by formal legal advice from the Parliament’s own senior legislative team. In an April 21, 2026 memorandum, senior legislative counsel Tiffany Stewart laid out that under Jamaica’s Standing Orders, select committees like the Ethics Committee have strictly limited authority, confined only to matters formally referred to them by the full House.

    Stewart noted that the committee’s original mandate was limited exclusively to reviewing and reporting on Gordon’s exemption motion, a process that concluded when the motion was approved by both the House of Representatives and the Senate earlier this year. Once the House adopted the committee’s final report, Stewart wrote, the committee exhausted its authority on the matter, falling under the functus officio doctrine. Without a new formal referral from the full House, the committee has no standing to reopen the case, even when new information emerges.

    Citing longstanding parliamentary principles laid out in the authoritative guide Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice, Stewart’s legal opinion stressed that any effort to reconsider the matter, regardless of new evidence, requires a fresh substantive motion from the House of Representatives. “Committees are creatures of the House and possess no independent authority to amend or revisit decisions already sanctioned by Parliament,” the memorandum clarified. Stewart added that the proper procedural path, when new concerns arise after a report is approved, is for the House to either issue a new referral sending the matter back to the committee, or to rescind its original decision before any further review can proceed.

  • Blood on their hands

    Blood on their hands

    During Tuesday’s 2026/27 Sectoral Debate in Jamaica’s House of Representatives, National Security and Peace Minister Dr. Horace Chang, who also serves as deputy prime minister, delivered a charged address holding civil society organizations directly responsible for the recent fatal shootings of two retired police officers from his constituency. The minister, who has a long history of tense clashes with advocacy groups – most notably Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ), which he has previously accused of accepting “blood money” – doubled down on his scathing criticism, arguing that unfounded public claims of unjustified police killings created a culture of retaliation that led to the officers’ deaths.

    Dr. Chang detailed the circumstances of one killing to the chamber, identifying the victim as Mr. Brown, an elderly retired officer described as a quiet, unassuming man. Brown was shot dead by gunmen while driving his aged Toyota Corolla, after slowing down to navigate a pothole. The minister emphasized that just one week before the attack, public claims had circulated that police had killed an unarmed civilian without justification, creating a hostile narrative that criminals exploited to target vulnerable retired officers. “These were retired, so they [gunmen] found the soft targets,” Dr. Chang told lawmakers.

    While maintaining that Jamaica remains a robust democracy rooted in the rule of law, and asserting he welcomes legitimate criticism of Jamaica’s security forces, Dr. Chang pushed back against repeated calls from civil society for independent investigations into police-related fatalities. He noted that multiple domestic oversight bodies already monitor, evaluate and regulate the conduct of police officers and public servants, dismissing repeated demands for extra independent reviews as “foolishness.”

    Citing official data from the July 2024 report from Jamaica’s Independent Commission of Investigations (Indecom), Dr. Chang backed his argument with empirical evidence. Between 2011 and 2023, Indecom investigated 1,936 fatal shootings involving security forces, and only 66 of those cases proceeded to criminal prosecution – a prosecution rate of just 3.4%. Since the start of 2024, 11 police officers have been charged in connection with fatal shootings; of those, 8 were off-duty at the time of the incident, with only 3 facing charges for events that occurred while on active duty.

    In a sharp rebuke of JFJ and other advocacy groups that push for increased police accountability measures including mandatory body cameras, Dr. Chang challenged activists to experience the intensity of armed policing first-hand: “Sometimes some of these people who are calling for the police to always have cameras, they should go out there and go to Twickenham Park [training school] and let the JCF fire some rounds and let them hear what the M16 bullets really sound like.”

    Dr. Chang remained unapologetic for his stance, stressing that law enforcement officers should not be placed in unnecessary danger because of unfounded “verandah talk” – a colloquial term for unsubstantiated public gossip. He argued that civil society groups and public opinion should not interfere with the work of established oversight bodies, noting that when false narratives portray police as routinely killing civilians without cause, criminals become emboldened to retaliate against easy targets like retired officers. “If criminals come to believe that police officers are killing persons wantonly they will retaliate and attack other officers whom they perceive as soft targets. These groups must adhere to the evidence reflected in the data. It is wrong to do otherwise. It is dangerous, and it is immoral,” Dr. Chang insisted.