作者: admin

  • Protests against murder charge for MV Barima captain, others; Indigenous Amerindians among activists picketing President’s office

    Protests against murder charge for MV Barima captain, others; Indigenous Amerindians among activists picketing President’s office

    On Wednesday, July 29, 2026, widespread coordinated protests broke out across Guyana, sparked by public outrage over murder charges filed against three Transport and Harbours Department (T&HD) employees in the deadly July 18 sinking of the MV Barima passenger vessel. The disaster has left 72 people confirmed dead and another 30 missing, presumed drowned, and protesters are demanding both accountability for senior government officials and justice for the accused workers.

    Demonstrations were held at three key locations: two coastal road sites on Demerara’s East and West coasts, and a mass picket outside the Office of the President in Georgetown. At Den Amstel Public Road on West Coast Demerara, roughly 30 demonstrators gathered in solidarity with 33-year-old Delon Granderson, a T&HD Goods Superintendent from Fellowship. Carrying hand-painted placards, protesters chanted “jail the criminals, free the innocent,” and called for the immediate removal of two senior cabinet members: Juan Edghill, the minister responsible for maritime transportation, and Deodat Indar, minister of maritime regulation. Placard messages included “wrongly accused, wrongly judged,” “free Delon Granderson,” and direct accusations that the two ministers “sank the evidence.”

    A separate protest at Melanie Damishana Public Road on East Coast Demerara centered on support for 40-year-old MV Barima captain Kevin “KP” Price, a local villager. Protesters there joined calls to release Price, Granderson, and the third accused, Chief Mate Rondell Dwayne Roberts, while also condemning the government for what they called selective justice. Demonstrators drew a contrast between the swift murder charges against the T&HD workers and the ongoing lack of progress in the death investigation of Adrianna Young, whose body was recovered from a hotel pool in Tuschen, East Bank Essequibo. Protesters chanted that “Anil Nandlall and the DPP were silent with Adrianna’s case but they suddenly have voice,” rejecting claims of equal treatment under the law.

    The three accused workers—Granderson, Price, and Roberts, 42, of Grove Public Road, East Bank Demerara—were formally charged with the murder of the 72 confirmed victims of the July 18 sinking, when the overloaded passenger vessel went down in rough coastal waters overnight.

    Outside the Office of the President, a larger coalition demonstration brought together Indigenous Amerindians organized by the Amerindian People’s Association (APA), joined by civil society activists, opposition politicians, and ordinary members of the public. Many of the victims of the sinking were Indigenous people traveling to coastal communities, leading protesters to highlight systemic neglect of Indigenous safety and rights. Placards carried messages including “indigenous lives matter,” “our First People deserve first class treatment,” and calls to hold senior leaders accountable for the disaster. One protester told Demerara Waves that the tragedy exposed deep-rooted failures across Guyana’s entire public transportation system, both on land and at sea. “It is reckless, it is lawless and the protocols are not in place. The same thing translates on the sea,” he said, calling for full systemic reform and stricter enforcement of safety rules to protect all Guyanese commuters.

    Representatives from three opposition groups—We Invest in Nationhood (WIN), the People’s National Congress Reform/ A Partnership for National Unity, and the Alliance For Change—joined the demonstration, with unarmed police maintaining a presence at the site. Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed reiterated a longstanding demand for the MV Barima wreck to be salvaged, arguing that recovering the vessel is the only way to recover remaining victims, give grieving families closure, and uncover the full truth of the disaster. He accused the government of blocking salvage efforts to avoid accountability, saying “they know they will be held accountable.” Mohamed also announced he had assembled a team of lawyers to secure substantial compensation for survivors and bereaved families, and revealed plans to organize rolling protests across all 10 of Guyana’s administrative regions in the coming weeks.

    The murder charges have split official response, even within the government. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Mark Phillips publicly stated he did not believe the captain and his crew had any intention to kill the passengers on board. Lawyers for the accused have already argued there is no evidence of premeditation or intent to kill required for a murder conviction. But Director of Public Prosecutions Shalimar Hack defended her decision to recommend the elevated charges, saying the decision was rooted in evidence presented to her office, relevant legal principles, binding case law from the United Kingdom, other Commonwealth jurisdictions, and the European Court of Human Rights, as well as broader public policy considerations.

    For his part, President Irfaan Ali has continued to hold one-on-one meetings with survivors and bereaved families, posting on his official Facebook page Wednesday that he remains committed to standing with affected communities through their healing process, beyond just the immediate aftermath of the disaster. “I continued my one-on-one engagements with survivors and families affected by the MV Barima tragedy,” he wrote, adding that the meetings uphold his earlier commitment to ensure all families receive the care, support, and assistance they need.

    Prime Minister Phillips clarified earlier this week that any final decision on salvaging the MV Barima will be guided by the wishes of victim families. He rejected opposition claims of a government cover-up, saying “Government has nothing to hide. I can tell you up front, we have nothing to hide.” He also denied that the government was pressuring families to oppose salvage efforts, and confirmed that no compensation would be offered to families before the Commission of Inquiry investigating the tragedy releases its final findings and recommendations.

  • Open Registration : Entrance Examination, State University of Haiti (2026-2027)

    Open Registration : Entrance Examination, State University of Haiti (2026-2027)

    Haiti’s largest public higher education institution, the State University of Haiti (UEH), has officially launched the application window for its 2026-2027 academic year entrance examination, with registration running from July 30 through August 28, 2026. Announced by UEH’s Office of the Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, the annual admission cycle gives prospective undergraduate students the opportunity to apply to up to three different UEH-affiliated academic units across the country, opening access to a wide range of degree programs for qualified Haitian learners. To be eligible for admission consideration, candidates must meet a clear set of baseline requirements established by the university. First, applicants cannot currently hold active student status at UEH. They must also possess one of the following: a valid secondary school graduation diploma, a 2025-2026 NS4 examination slip (pending official confirmation of results), or an equivalent educational credential formally issued by Haiti’s Ministry of National Education and Vocational Training (MENFP). All applicants are required to pay an examination fee of 800 Haitian gourdes per selected academic institution, and must hold a valid Tax Identification Number (NIF). Candidates under the age of 18, who are not yet required to obtain their own NIF, are permitted to use a parent’s NIF to complete their application. The application process follows a step-by-step structure designed to streamline registration for all candidates. First, applicants must complete their fee payment at any branch of SOGEBANK, depositing 800 gourdes per selected institution into the official UEH admission account numbered 706054558. Once payment is confirmed, candidates must fill out the mandatory online application form through UEH’s dedicated admissions portal at https://admission.ueh.edu.ht. During the online registration process, applicants will be required to input their payment confirmation number, upload a scanned copy of their payment slip, and select up to three academic units they wish to apply to. After submitting the online form, candidates must print a copy of the completed registration form, then attend an in-person validation session at their selected institutions on the scheduled dates and locations provided, where they will receive their official exam entrance card. For the in-person registration validation step, candidates must bring several required documents, including two identical, recent passport-sized photographs (taken within the last six months, with the candidate’s last name, first name, phone number and NIF written on the back of each), the printed online registration form, official proof of NIF, the original SOGEBANK deposit slip for each selected institution, and their secondary school leaving certificate or 2025-2026 NS4 exam slip. Only candidates who successfully pass the entrance examination will be required to submit additional documentation to formally enroll at their chosen academic unit, including an official birth certificate or extract from the Haitian National Archives, two additional recent passport-sized photos with the same identifying information on the back, and official proof of NIF. Entrance examinations are scheduled on a rolling basis across different months, starting in mid-September 2026. The Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy will hold its exam first, on September 13, followed by the Faculty of Dentistry on September 20, and the Henry Christophe Campus of Limonade will host its exams from September 21 to 23. October 3 marks the exam date for all three National School of Nursing campuses in Cayes, Cap-Haïtien, and Jérémie, with the Faculty of Human Sciences following on October 4, and the Institute of African Studies and Research of Haiti holding its exam on October 11. A large group of 8 academic units will hold their entrance exams on October 18: the School of Law and Economics of Port-de-Paix, School of Law of Hinche, School of Law of Jacmel, School of Law and Economics of Fort-Liberté, School of Law and Economics of Les Cayes, School of Law and Economics of Les Gonaïves, Higher Teacher Training College, and the Faculty of Law, Economics and Management of Cap-Haïtien. The remaining exam dates are: October 24 for the Faculty of Sciences, October 25 for the Faculty of Applied Linguistics, November 1 for the Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, November 8 for the National Institute of Administration, Management and Institute of Advanced International Studies, November 15 for the Faculty of Law and Economics, and November 22 for the Faculty of Ethnology. UEH currently operates 23 academic campuses and units across multiple Haitian cities including Port-au-Prince, Limonade, Hinche, Cap-Haïtien, Les Cayes and Jacmel, with full addresses for all units listed on the official admissions announcement. The university has also issued important reminders for all prospective applicants. No fee refunds will be granted for any reason, including late applications, failure to meet eligibility requirements, failure to follow registration procedures, or payments made to incorrect banks or accounts. The university emphasizes that online registration via the official admissions portal is mandatory for all applicants; no paper applications will be accepted. Candidates with questions about the registration process or eligibility requirements can contact the UEH admissions office via email at admission@ueh.edu.ht, or by phone at +509 3782 3168, +509 4404 5257, +509 3704 1522, or +509 3750 6857. The UEH Rectorate is located at 21 Rue Rivière, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, and additional information can be found on the university’s official website at www.ueh.edu.ht.

  • Haiti’s Minister of Agriculture tours Grand’Anse

    Haiti’s Minister of Agriculture tours Grand’Anse

    In a working visit focused on advancing food security and rural development in Haiti, Minister of Agriculture Marcelin Aubourg, a professional agricultural engineer, recently traveled through Haiti’s Grand’Anse department to conduct on-site oversight of initiatives under the Resilient Agriculture for Food Security Project (PARSA). The primary goal of the tour was to evaluate on-the-ground progress of two high-priority infrastructure initiatives: the construction of family-sized rainwater harvesting tanks and the expansion and upgrade of rural road networks. Both sets of projects are designed to remove longstanding barriers to accessing agricultural production zones and lift living standards for local communities that have long struggled with limited infrastructure.

    The first stop on the minister’s itinerary was the commune of Pestel, where the delegation first traveled to the small community of Deron to check progress on the local water tank program. After walking through the construction sites and speaking with contractors, the team sat down with local residents to hear first-hand accounts of how the new infrastructure has already changed daily life. Beneficiaries told the delegation that the 3,000-gallon rainwater harvesting tanks, installed through the Ministry of Agriculture’s leadership, have put an end to a years-long struggle for consistent access to clean water for household and agricultural use, opening the door to a more stable and dignified quality of life for the whole community.

    Leaving Pestel, the ministerial convoy traveled next to the commune of Beaumont, where they inspected ongoing construction on a 300-meter rural road expansion that spans the second communal section of Chardonnette and the nearby locality of Dumois. The journey into Chardonnette itself served as a stark reminder of the daily challenges area residents face navigating poorly maintained roads, underscoring the urgent need for the upgrades the project is delivering.

    Across every community the delegation visited, local residents, parishioners, and the local parish priest turned out to extend a warm welcome to Minister Aubourg and the entire PARSA project team. Conversations with locals were marked by broad smiles and repeated expressions of gratitude for the tangible improvements the projects have already brought to the region.

    To wrap up the multi-site supervisory tour, the minister and his team traveled to Fonds-Rouge Torbeck, the ninth communal section of Jérémie. In this area, the Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Rural Development (MARNDR) has already completed several key infrastructure projects through the PARSA framework. Finished works include more than 350 linear meters of rural road constructed with reinforced concrete strips, erosion protection infrastructure for the critical Hypollite natural spring, and resurfacing of roughly 200 linear meters of unpaved dirt road. Local leaders say these completed upgrades already represent a tangible, meaningful improvement to daily life for area residents, while creating new opportunities for long-term growth and investment in the region’s agricultural sector.

  • American Airlines announces its daily flights to Cap

    American Airlines announces its daily flights to Cap

    In a landmark move that re-opens direct air connectivity between the United States and Haiti, Fort Worth-based American Airlines has announced plans to launch daily nonstop flights between Miami International Airport and Cap-Haïtien, starting November 1, 2026. This initiative marks the first resumption of scheduled commercial service to Haiti by any major U.S. airline in recent years, signaling a critical step toward rebuilding the country’s international travel links.

    The new daily route will be operated using Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft, with a carefully calibrated schedule designed for maximum convenience for both leisure and travel passengers. Outbound flights from Miami will depart at 10:15 a.m. local time, arriving in Cap-Haïtien at 12:15 p.m. local time. The return leg will depart Cap-Haïtien just one hour later at 1:15 p.m., touching down back in Miami at 3:15 p.m. local time the same day.

    This carefully structured timeline not only creates a seamless direct travel option for passengers moving between South Florida and northern Haiti, but also opens up easy connections to hundreds of domestic and international destinations across American Airlines’ extensive global route network. For the large Haitian diaspora community concentrated in South Florida, the new service removes the need for complicated multi-leg itineraries that have made visiting family and home communities in northern Haiti far more difficult in recent years.

    Beyond the immediate benefits to travelers, the new route strengthens Miami’s long-standing status as American Airlines’ primary gateway to the Caribbean region. The carrier already operates one of the most expansive route networks in the Caribbean, and the addition of Cap-Haïtien reinforces its commitment to growing connectivity across the region.

    Industry observers frame American Airlines’ decision as a pivotal milestone for Haiti’s travel and economic recovery. The move recognizes Cap-Haïtien’s growing role as Haiti’s main northern air gateway, re-establishes a direct air link between the U.S. and one of Haiti’s most historically significant coastal cities, and returns the destination to the active route map of one of the world’s largest commercial airlines.

    For passengers with family and cultural ties to Haiti, the new flights translate to far less stressful, more affordable travel to visit loved ones. For Haiti as a whole, the service represents a tangible vote of confidence in the country’s gradual recovery and a renewal of international connectivity that has been disrupted for years. For Cap-Haïtien, a city rich with Caribbean history and cultural appeal, the launch paves the way for increased visitor traffic and renewed global engagement, putting the destination back on the radar for international travelers after years of limited access.

  • PM hails Sir Garry as symbol of national pride, possibility

    PM hails Sir Garry as symbol of national pride, possibility

    Barbados gathered this week to lay to rest one of its most beloved and consequential figures, cricket legend and national hero the Right Excellent Sir Garfield Sobers, with tributes pouring in from leaders, athletes and citizens celebrating how his iconic career shaped the country’s identity in the early days of its independence. At the state funeral held to honor the iconic all-rounder, Prime Minister Mia Mottley delivered the official national tribute, framing Sir Garry’s life and unprecedented on-field achievements as a defining force for a newly independent nation breaking free from the constraints of its colonial past.

    Sir Garry’s rise to global cricket stardom coincided directly with Barbados’ transition to independence, a historic alignment that Mottley emphasized has permanently tied the sporting icon to the very birth of the modern Barbadian nation. His extraordinary success on pitches across the world during that pivotal era became an enduring source of national pride, collective confidence, and hopeful ambition for a people forging their own path after centuries of colonial rule.

    “Sir Garry gave us the gift of understanding that even though others may have ruled us for over 300 years, they could not define our greatness, and could not bludgeon our aspirations,” Mottley told the gathered crowd of mourners and dignitaries. “It is a gift to the nation that could not have been greater. I say today as we say farewell to you Sir Garry, this is your final walk from Kensington Oval. This will be our country’s last opportunity to give you that which you became so accustomed to — a standing ovation.”

    Beyond his unmatched sporting record, Mottley highlighted the character that defined Sir Garry off the pitch, noting that his life proved excellence and humility could coexist, inspiring generations of young Barbadians to believe that greatness was within their reach regardless of their background. “We thank you for teaching us that greatness could wear humility, that excellence could still belong to ordinary people. That the dreams of a little boy from the Bayland could become the inheritance of an entire nation,” she said.

    Mottley wove in personal anecdotes of her time playing dominoes with Sir Garry, recalling that even as an intensely competitive opponent, he never strayed from the principles of fairness and good sportsmanship. Those casual games, she said, taught her that fierce competitiveness could share space with radical humility, grace, and a deep commitment to fair play — traits that defined his entire career and public life. She also echoed the words of late calypso artist Emile Straker: “When a man good he good and when a man great, he great,” a line she said perfectly captured the scale of Sir Garry’s impact, which stretched far beyond sport to become a core part of Barbados’ national story.

    The funeral drew a wide range of high-profile attendees, including current and former regional government officials: former Barbadian Prime Minister Freundel Stuart and former Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley were among those in attendance, alongside fellow national hero and global music icon Robyn Rihanna Fenty. Photographs from the service captured the gathering of leadership and cultural icons, who came together to pay their final respects.

    Sir Garry passed away just days short of his 90th birthday, a timing that carried extra symbolic weight for the regional cricket community. Fresh off a victory in the Second Test against Pakistan secured on what would have been Sir Garry’s 90th birthday, the entire West Indies cricket team attended the funeral to honor the man who blazed a trail for and inspired generations of Caribbean cricketers.

  • FLASH : Voter registration begins in the West Department

    FLASH : Voter registration begins in the West Department

    Haiti’s Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) has officially kicked off the first phase of voter registration operations in the country’s West Department, marking a key step forward in preparations for upcoming national elections. The initial registration drive, which launched on the morning of Thursday, July 30, 2026, is concentrated across three high-population municipalities: Pétion-ville, Delmas, and Tabarre, with 10 purpose-designated Registration and Voting Centers (CIVs) open to eligible citizens across the region.

    The formal launch ceremony for the initiative was held at 10:00 a.m. local time on July 30 at the Pétion-ville National High School, one of the 10 official registration sites. The five CIVs operating in Pétion-ville include Pétion-ville National High School, Guatemala National School, Meyotte National School, Frères National School, and Benoît Batraville High School in Laboule 13. Three additional sites have been set up in Delmas: Horatius Laventure High School, Antoine and Georges Izmery High School in Petite Place Cazeau, and the Silo CASEC Office. Rounding out the network of registration centers are two locations in Tabarre: Jean-Marie Vincent High School and Tabarre National School (Tabarre 25).

    In its official announcement, the CEP has called on all eligible Haitian citizens holding a valid national identification card to visit their nearest designated center to complete registration and be added to the official electoral roll ahead of the upcoming polls. The electoral body emphasized that successful voter registration is a non-negotiable prerequisite for exercising the fundamental democratic right to vote, and a core requirement for participation in the upcoming electoral process.

    To ensure compliance with national electoral regulations, the CEP has urged all qualified potential voters to finalize their registration within the current phase timeline, following all applicable legal procedures laid out for the process. This initial rollout in West Department paves the way for subsequent registration phases across other regions of Haiti as the country advances toward its scheduled elections.

  • Court Shoots Down Brads Multimillion-Dollar Tax Challenge

    Court Shoots Down Brads Multimillion-Dollar Tax Challenge

    In a landmark ruling released July 29, 2026, the High Court has dealt a decisive defeat to businessman Kim Wai Chee and two Brads gaming companies, who launched a multimillion-dollar legal challenge against tax assessments tied to their Boledo and Jackpot gambling operations. Justice Nadine Nabie, presiding over the case, ruled that the claimants’ legal challenge was fundamentally misconceived and constituted an abuse of the court’s process.

    While the judge confirmed that both Chee and Brads Gaming Company Limited held legal standing to bring the suit, she emphasized that the pair of firms and their representative skipped the mandatory, statutorily defined legal process required to contest tax evaluations under the nation’s Tax Administration and Procedure Act. Under the framework of this legislation, any taxpayer seeking to challenge an assessment must first complete an internal administrative review, followed by an appeal to a dedicated appellate body, before they are eligible to bring their claim before the High Court. Chee and the two Brads entities skipped these required steps entirely, instead filing a constitutional motion and administrative challenge directly with the High Court.

    The claimants argued that the Director General of the tax authority had overstepped her legislative authority when issuing what are known as “best judgment” tax assessments. They claimed violations of multiple fundamental rights, including the right to protection under the law, equal protection under the law, and the right to natural justice and fair procedure. Following a trial held in 2025, Justice Nabie issued a 50-page ruling that addressed every technical argument raised by the claimants, ultimately finding no evidence of any fundamental rights violations.

    Senior Counsel Magali Marin, who represented the government in the proceedings, explained that the best judgment assessments were only issued because of the claimants’ own failure to cooperate with tax authorities. The dispute traces back to March 2020, when Brads Gaming Company Limited’s exclusive operating license expired. In July of that same year, tax regulators requested the companies’ full financial records for the un-audited operating periods, but the firms failed to produce the required documentation. This non-compliance left tax authorities no option but to issue the best judgment evaluations.

    The total value of the contested assessments stands at roughly $4.32 million: approximately $1.19 million against Brads Gaming Company Limited, and $3.13 million against Brads Gaming Group Limited. In her ruling, Justice Nabie upheld the tax authority’s legal power to issue the best judgment assessments, rejected all forms of relief requested by the claimants, and ordered Chee and the two companies to cover 50% of the government’s legal costs incurred during the proceedings.

    Marin noted that the ruling clears the way for the tax authority to enforce the payment of the assessed taxes, including the seizure of assets if the companies hold recoverable assets. The ruling also included key clarification regarding Chee’s personal liability: while the assessments themselves were issued to the two corporate entities, Justice Nabie emphasized that the closure of the businesses and the shuttering of their physical offices does not release responsible officers like Chee from their legal obligations under tax law. In paragraph 51 of her judgment, the justice wrote that ruling otherwise would set an absurd precedent that would allow corporate leaders to evade tax duties simply by closing operations.

  • Dean Barrow Challenges Appeal Court Ruling in Cats Caye Battle

    Dean Barrow Challenges Appeal Court Ruling in Cats Caye Battle

    A decades-long controversial land dispute over a 14-acre parcel of prime coastal property at Fisherman’s Caye has reached the region’s highest judicial body, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), with millions of dollars in potential taxpayer liability hanging in the balance. The conflict traces its roots back to 2008, when the Belizean government issued a formal land grant to Rudolph Ramirez, despite the fact that the disputed property had already been legally transferred to a third party years prior to the grant’s issuance.

    The legal battle has already wound its way through two lower courts: the initial High Court hearing awarded Ramirez and his co-claimant Julius Zabaneh more than $2 million in compensation for the flawed land grant. However, that ruling was later overturned by the Court of Appeal, which voided the original 2008 grant and rejected the multi-million damage award, leaving the claimants entitled only to the $2,878 that Ramirez originally paid for the land. Now, the claimants have brought their challenge to the Court of Appeal’s decision before the CCJ, which wrapped up three hours of oral arguments from both sides this week before reserving judgment for a future date.

    Representing claimants Ramirez and Zabaneh, senior counsel and former prime minister Dean Barrow argued that the Court of Appeal overstepped its authority when it reopened core questions of legal liability that had already been settled in the initial High Court proceedings. Barrow explained that the unusual procedural history of the case worked in his clients’ favor: when the claimants originally moved to strike the government’s defense as legally defective and failing to state a valid claim, the government’s own legal team did not object to the motion. Following the unopposed motion, the High Court struck the defense and entered a default judgment on liability against the government, a procedural outcome Barrow says the Court of Appeal had no legal basis to undo.

    “That notice of intention to vary, cross appeal in short, challenged the award of the two million and odd made by the trial judge on several grounds. One of those is the contract made between the claimant, the defendants, the appellants and the respondents was a nullity and that the court at first instance was therefore wrong to have made judgment and was wrong to have made the liability order,” Barrow told reporters in a post-hearing comment. “The judgment was entered after the claimants made an application to strike the defense on the basis that it was wholly defective, that it did not disclose any proper case. And what is important, slightly peculiar feature of all of this is that the respondents, the defendants in this instance, agreed with the application to strike. The way the judges strike out order framed it is that hearing Mr. Lindo, who was appearing then for the claimants and then being no objection from Ms. Matute, who was appearing then for the defendants, the court would proceed to make the order and enter judgement, Now the strike out application succeeded.”

    On the opposing side, government legal representatives argue that forcing taxpayers to foot a $2 million bill for the error is unfair and legally unjustified. Senior counsel Eamon Courtenay, representing the government, told the CCJ that the government never held legal title to the land at the time it issued the 2008 grant to Ramirez, meaning it had no valid ownership rights to transfer to the claimants. Courtenay further argued that Ramirez was fully aware the land had already been granted to another party when he accepted the second, erroneous grant, and is now improperly seeking massive damages for a transaction he knew was flawed from its inception. Even official government rectification records explicitly confirm the 2008 grant was a bureaucratic mistake, he added.

    “It is impossible for the government to grant title to land that it does not own and on the pleadings, which was the only thing before the court, what the claimants said was that I found that out, I knew it, I told the government and the government gave me a second grant for the same piece of land which it did not own and I am now coming to ask the court for a remedy,” Courtenay stated during his arguments. “The rectification reads your honor, fiat grant 204 of 2008 was erroneously issued to Rudolph Ramirez. So the minister is saying I gave you a title in error.”

    After three hours of detailed submissions from both legal teams, the CCJ opted to reserve its ruling, with no specific date for judgment announced as of July 29, 2026. The outcome of the case will not only resolve a years-long private land dispute but also set a key precedent for government liability and damages for bureaucratic errors in Belize’s land grant system.

  • GOB Promises Reform Soon, Belizeans Demand Accountability Now

    GOB Promises Reform Soon, Belizeans Demand Accountability Now

    Weeks after a high-stakes defense ministry spending scandal broke in Belize, a national debate has emerged over whether the government is prioritizing systemic reform over holding wrongdoers accountable, leaving the public demanding answers for alleged mismanagement and corruption.

    The controversy, which centers on questionable supply contracts and non-compliant spending practices within the Ministry of Defense, has already placed two former defense ministers—Florencio Marin Jr. and Oscar Mira—on administrative leave as the Auditor General completes a full independent audit. When the scandal first emerged in early July 2026, Prime Minister John Briceño offered a clear public guarantee: no one would be shielded from consequences, regardless of their position.

    “The auditor general will carry out a full, unobstructed investigation. If any wrongdoing is uncovered, whether connected to career public officers or elected politicians, those responsible will be held to account. We will not engage in a cover-up,” Briceño stated in a July 3 address to the nation.

    In the weeks that followed, however, the national conversation has shifted steadily toward broad structural changes to Belize’s long-troubled public procurement system, rather than immediate accountability for the current controversy. Cabinet ministers across the ruling People’s United Party (PUP) administration have framed the scandal as a long-overdue opportunity to fix systemic flaws that have plagued successive governments of both major parties for decades.

    Kareem Musa, a senior cabinet minister, noted July 23 that problematic procurement processes have “bedeviled us for decades, not just this PUP administration, past UDP and PUP administrations.” Home Affairs Minister Francis Fonseca echoed that assessment on July 21, acknowledging “we have a broken procurement system and that has been the case for many years. Successive governments under both administrations may have been comfortable with that broken system.”

    Cabinet Minister Henry Charles Usher added July 27 that the priority is to close gaps in oversight and update existing controls, a position that aligns with the government’s growing focus on systemic reform. “I think it’s important that if there are areas that need improvement, that those areas are improved, that if there are additional controls that need to be put in place… What is important is that an audit is done,” Usher said.

    While most political leaders agree that reforming the broken procurement framework is a critical long-term goal, many public figures and ordinary Belizeans argue that accountability for the current scandal is being sidelined. The core unresolved question remains: once the audit is finalized, will any senior officials or public servants actually face consequences for violating the Finance and Audit Reform Act?

    Richard “Dickie” Bradley, a former public service chief executive with decades of experience in government finance, warned that the country’s public financial management framework is already failing at its most basic functions. “We have started to see in the country that something is going terribly wrong with the control of public monies. There is no accountability. There are no checks and balance. There is no transparency. You can’t run a country like that,” Bradley argued.

    Unlike many commentators who have focused blame on the two former defense ministers on leave, Bradley contends that ultimate responsibility for improper spending lies with the career public officers tasked with managing public finances. “There is a pressure on some public officers, but there is also corruption involved because if I defending my invoice to collect money, I can say to you, you know if you speed up my thing, you gonna get something. And then the second time around you say like, I don’t want to speed up nothing because da wa lee slightaz, can’t even pay school fees for that kind of money. I give you more and so,” Bradley explained, using local Kriol phrasing to describe the incremental growth of corrupt practices. “The buck stops at the public officers. The accountants, the finance officers, the chief executive officer. That is where the problem can be resolved and solved. If we find that the procedure is a little outdated and a bit colonial, we have the ability to improve and change it.”

    Bradley’s position rejects the government’s framing that systemic reform must come before accountability, arguing instead that holding individual bad actors responsible is the more urgent priority. The Public Service Union (PSU), the country’s main public sector labor body, has gone even further, openly calling for the permanent removal of former defense minister Oscar Mira from Cabinet. PSU president Dean Flowers stated July 24 that the organization has formally demanded Mira’s permanent ouster from government.

    As calls for broad procurement reform grow louder, the fate of accountability remains unresolved. Belizeans are now watching closely to see whether the government will hold wrongdoers responsible first, or push through systemic changes before any consequences are handed down. Reporting for News Five, Paul Lopez delivered this update from Belize City.

  • Price Gaps in BDF Food Contracts Go Beyond Mayonnaise

    Price Gaps in BDF Food Contracts Go Beyond Mayonnaise

    What began as a public controversy over inflated mayonnaise pricing for military rations has expanded into a broader investigation of Belize Defense Force (BDF) food supply contracts, with newly leaked procurement documents revealing systemic price gaps across multiple staple products that have cost taxpayers millions of extra dollars.

    Local outlet News Five’s months-long review of Ministry of Defense tender records from the 2023-2024 fiscal year confirms that the abnormal markup on mayonnaise was not an isolated incident. In multiple product categories, the ministry awarded contracts to suppliers that submitted far higher bids, even when substantially lower-priced offers from qualified vendors were on the table. The findings have reignited public debate over government procurement transparency, asking whether public funds are being managed to deliver maximum value, or if unstated factors are driving contract awards.

    The mayonnaise scandal first broke when records showed J&J Imports won a BDF supply contract despite pricing its product nearly 400% higher than a competing bid from Mount Pleasant Fresh Produce – and both firms ultimately secured contracts to deliver the condiment. The newly reviewed documents show this pattern repeats across other common ration items.

    Take coconut powder, for example. Belize Imports and Goods (BIG), a firm registered in 2017, offered a 12-packet unit of coconut powder for just $12.84, and supplied 421 units to the BDF each month. By comparison, the Ministry of Defense paid Mount Pleasant Fresh Produce $28.60 per identical unit, for a monthly allocation of 500 units. The highest bidder, A and Y Fresh Vegetables, received a contract at $30 per unit – more than double the price of BIG’s low bid.

    The same pricing discrepancy appears in the procurement of pepper sauce, another staple for military rations. Northern Heat, a food manufacturer founded in 2013, supplied 20 cases of 10-ounce pepper sauce monthly at a contract price of $37.20 per case. Mount Pleasant Fresh Produce, meanwhile, was awarded a contract to supply 3,396 cases annually of 10-ounce Marie Sharp Pepper sauce at $74 per case – a markup that far outpaces even the producer’s current retail price of $56 per case directly to consumers. A third supplier, Elodia Cervantes, was paid $86 per case of the same 10-ounce product. Once again, the highest contracted price was more than double the lowest available bid.

    While the available tender documents do not clarify whether differing product brands or specifications explain any of the markup for items outside of Mount Pleasant’s Marie Sharp line, the sheer scale of the price gaps has prompted serious questions about the bid evaluation and award process. Reporters note that the pattern of awarding contracts to higher bidders across multiple product categories cannot be easily dismissed as a clerical error, leaving taxpayers to wait for answers about how public procurement for the national military is being conducted.