作者： admin

MEXICO CITY, Mexico – Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum delivered a sharp diplomatic rebuttal on Monday against remarks from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who invoked the historic Monroe Doctrine to justify a recent military operation in Venezuela. The exchange signals escalating tensions over hemispheric sovereignty and foreign policy approaches in the Americas.

Trump characterized the weekend raid, which resulted in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, as a modern application of the 1823 Monroe Doctrine—a policy originally articulated by President James Monroe asserting that the Americas were off-limits to further European colonization and under U.S. influence.

In a firm response, President Sheinbaum challenged this worldview during a press conference, stating unequivocally, ‘The Americas do not belong to any doctrine or any power. The American continent belongs to the peoples of each of the countries that comprise it.’ Her comments underscore a growing resistance among Latin American nations against external intervention and great-power dominance.

The incident highlights deepening ideological divisions within the hemisphere, particularly between left-leaning governments in Latin America and U.S. foreign policy strategies. Analysts suggest that Sheinbaum’s statement may rally regional support ahead of key diplomatic meetings, reinforcing calls for non-intervention and mutual respect among American states.

GENEVA, Switzerland—In a significant financial move, the Swiss government announced on Monday the immediate freezing of all assets held within its jurisdiction by former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and his close associates. This decisive action follows the dramatic capture of Maduro in Caracas through a U.S. military operation and his subsequent extradition to New York to face narcotrafficking charges.

The Federal Council characterized Venezuela’s political climate as ‘volatile’ and justified the asset seizure as a precautionary measure to prevent the potential transfer of illicitly acquired funds from Swiss financial institutions. The freeze, enacted under Switzerland’s Federal Act on the Freezing and Restitution of Illicit Assets Held by Foreign Politically Exposed Persons, will remain in effect for an initial period of four years, pending further evaluation.

Official statements clarified that the measure specifically targets individuals not previously covered by existing Venezuelan sanctions implemented since 2018. Crucially, the freeze does not apply to members of Venezuela’s current government administration.

The Swiss government emphasized that the legal circumstances surrounding Maduro’s removal from power—whether constitutional or contrary to international law—do not factor into the asset freezing decision. Rather, the determining consideration is the factual change in power status and the increased likelihood of future legal proceedings by Venezuela regarding allegedly illicit assets.

Bern concurrently expressed concern over Venezuela’s unstable situation, advocating for de-escalation, restraint, and adherence to international law principles including the prohibition of force and respect for territorial integrity. Switzerland has repeatedly offered its diplomatic services to facilitate peaceful conflict resolution.

The government further committed that should future legal proceedings confirm the illicit nature of the frozen assets, Switzerland would work to ensure these resources ultimately benefit the Venezuelan population.

NEW YORK — A significant political controversy has erupted following United States military operations in Venezuela, resulting in the capture and extradition of President Nicolás Maduro to face narcotics trafficking charges in New York. The action has drawn sharp criticism from Caribbean community leaders and U.S. congressional representatives who allege constitutional overreach and dangerous foreign policy implications.

Caribbean-born activists in New York voiced profound concerns regarding regional stability. Grenadian Martin Felix characterized the operation as a manifestation of the “Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine,” prioritizing oil interests over people and normalizing military confrontation in the Caribbean. He emphasized that these actions directly challenge the region’s longstanding aspiration to remain a zone of peace and undermine international legal norms.

Jamaican activist Delroy Wright linked the vulnerability of Caribbean nations to the failure of the 1960s Caribbean Federation proposal, suggesting that a unified regional body would have provided stronger resistance against foreign intervention. He specifically criticized Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar for allegedly enabling Trump’s actions, making every Caribbean nation susceptible to invasion.

The response from U.S. lawmakers was equally forceful. Caribbean-American Congresswoman Yvette Clarke (D-NY) condemned the unauthorized military strikes as a “brazen affront to the rule of law,” conducted without congressional authorization. The Congressional Black Caucus, which Clarke chairs, labeled the operation a “grave and illegal abuse of power” that prioritizes oil interests over domestic needs like healthcare.

Democratic leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer demanded immediate congressional briefings, stressing that while Maduro is an illegitimate leader, bypassing constitutional processes sets a dangerous precedent. They emphasized that the framers vested war-declaring powers solely in Congress as the branch closest to the people.

In defense of the administration, Republican Senator Tom Cotton, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, argued that congressional notification isn’t required for criminal arrests, whether domestic or international, comparing Maduro’s capture to routine FBI operations against indicted criminals.

The unfolding situation highlights a critical tension between executive action and congressional oversight, with significant implications for U.S.-Caribbean relations and international legal norms.

COPENHAGEN, Denmark — International leaders have united in condemnation following President Donald Trump’s renewed assertions regarding United States territorial ambitions toward Greenland. The autonomous Danish territory’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen issued a forceful rebuke via social media, stating: “That’s enough now. No more pressure. No more insinuations. No more fantasies of annexation.”

The controversy emerged during President Trump’s comments to journalists aboard Air Force One on Sunday, where he articulated strategic motivations behind potential acquisition of the mineral-rich Arctic territory. “We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it,” Trump stated, referencing the island’s geopolitical significance amid changing Arctic conditions.

Greenland possesses substantial untapped reserves of rare earth minerals and occupies a critical position along emerging shipping routes as polar ice recedes. Additionally, the territory lies along the shortest missile trajectory between Russia and the United States, hosting an existing American military installation at Thule Air Base.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen joined the growing diplomatic pushback, urging the United States to cease threatening rhetoric toward its traditional ally. By Monday, multiple European nations and the European Union had expressed solidarity with Copenhagen’s position.

Prime Minister Nielsen emphasized Greenland’s openness to diplomatic engagement while insisting on proper channels: “We are open to dialogue. We are open to discussions. But this must happen through the proper channels and with respect for international law.”

The administration’s renewed interest in Greenland follows heightened military involvement in Venezuela, raising concerns about expanded territorial ambitions. President Trump indicated forthcoming attention to the matter, noting “We’ll worry about Greenland in about two months” and suggesting more immediate discussion within “20 days.”

KINGSTOWN, St. Vincent (CMC) – The newly installed government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines has declared it is vigilantly observing the escalating political and military crisis in Venezuela after United States forces reportedly captured the nation’s President, Nicolas Maduro, and his spouse. Foreign Affairs Minister Fitz Bramble characterized the situation as one of ‘grave concern’ for both the small island developing state and the wider Caribbean region. Minister Bramble, a former diplomat, emphasized that the nation’s allegiance lies with the collective diplomatic stance of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), which has consistently advocated for peaceful dialogue and the strict adherence to international law. He confirmed that Prime Minister Dr. Godwin Friday’s administration, barely a month into its term, is assessing the potential far-reaching economic and political ramifications for its own nation. The SVG government remains in constant communication with its embassy in Caracas, where Ambassador Gareth Bynoe has reported that all diplomatic personnel are safe and no Vincentian nationals in Venezuela have yet sought consular assistance. While acknowledging friendships with both Venezuela and the United States, the government has pledged to keep its citizens informed as the volatile situation continues to develop.