作者： admin

Environmental regulators in Trinidad and Tobago have unveiled a four-point strategy to address persistent noise pollution concerns during Carnival celebrations, drawing measured approval from community advocates who remain skeptical about implementation effectiveness.

The Environmental Management Authority (EMA) announced enhanced oversight protocols on January 15, including mandatory publication of noise variation notices on its official website, requirement for event organizers to submit detailed proximity maps identifying residential areas, special protection measures for noise-sensitive zones like hospitals, and targeted monitoring of venues with previous noise complaints.

Lindy-Ann Bachoo, Vice President of Citizens Against Noise Pollution (CANPTT), acknowledged the proposals as a positive initial step while expressing significant reservations about enforcement mechanisms. Her primary concern centers on the apparent reliance on self-regulation by event promoters, a approach she characterizes as historically ineffective.

“Who is verifying pre-event preparations and post-compliance?” Bachoo questioned during her dialogue with Newsday. “These noise mitigation plans may appear comprehensive on paper, but without rigorous onsite verification, they remain theoretical promises.”

The advocacy leader specifically challenged the practicality of promoter-operated complaint hotlines, noting: “When residents experience excessive noise and receive no response from event lines, or obtain merely conciliatory assurances without actual intervention, the system fails its fundamental purpose.”

Bachoo highlighted critical gaps in the proposed framework, particularly the absence of clearly defined penalties for violations and no established protocol for repeat offenders. She further questioned whether the EMA possesses adequate staffing capacity for meaningful enforcement, referencing previous congressional testimony where officials acknowledged operating with approximately one-third of their required personnel.

The longstanding tension between cultural celebration and community welfare remains evident in Bachoo’s concluding remarks: “When profitability takes precedence over people’s wellbeing, and promoters demonstrate indifference to how their operations affect surrounding communities, regulatory intentions must translate into actionable enforcement.”

In a landmark ruling that clarifies financial arrangements within romantic relationships, the High Court has determined that a vehicle purchased during the COVID-19 pandemic rightfully belongs to the man who provided the funds, not the woman who received them.

Justice Westmin James delivered a written verdict favoring Steffon Belfon, who had transferred approximately CAD$50,000 from Canada in October 2020 to Marva Khan, his romantic partner at the time. The court found compelling evidence that these funds were specifically designated for purchasing a vehicle for Belfon’s use, not as an unconditional gift as Khan had claimed.

The legal dispute emerged following the dissolution of the couple’s relationship. Belfon, a self-employed contractor stranded in Canada due to pandemic restrictions, testified that he sent the money anticipating post-budget price increases. He intended for Khan to acquire the vehicle on his behalf during his absence from Trinidad.

Justice James’ analysis revealed that Khan acknowledged under cross-examination that the initial transfer expressly served the purpose of vehicle acquisition. The judge noted that the defendant’s testimony contained significant inconsistencies that undermined her credibility.

“Based on the balance of probabilities,” Justice James wrote, “the CAD$50,000 transfer was intended for vehicle procurement for the claimant’s benefit. The presumption of a resulting trust remains undisputed.”

The court ordered Khan to transfer the Honda Vezel hybrid SUV—purchased for approximately $185,000 and registered in her name—to Belfon’s ownership within 30 days. However, the judge dismissed Belfon’s claims regarding household items and additional funds totaling TT$120,400, noting that a subsequent CAD$10,000 transfer appeared consistent with gratuitous payment within their personal relationship.

Both parties achieved partial success in their claims, resulting in no costs awarded to either side. Legal representation included attorneys Sunil Seecharan and Vanita Ramroop for Belfon, while Shawn Fulchan represented Khan.

Trinidad and Tobago is confronting a severe youth mental health crisis characterized by escalating rates of suicide, self-harm, and emotional distress among children. Archbishop Charles Jason Gordon has issued an urgent nationwide appeal for immediate intervention from all sectors of society, declaring the well-being of the nation’s youth to be at critical risk.

The Archbishop’s warning precedes a pivotal national briefing titled ‘The Urgency of Now: A National Call to Save Our Children,’ scheduled for January 19 at the Archbishop’s House in Port of Spain. This event, organized by the Samaritan Movement—a trauma-response initiative established by the Archdiocese of Port of Spain—aims to address what organizers describe as an escalating emergency affecting children across educational institutions.

Darrion Narine, programme manager of the Samaritan Movement, corroborated the severity of the situation, stating that the country has reached a breaking point. Based on their fieldwork across primary and secondary schools, the movement has documented an alarming surge in student distress, with both overt cries for help and silent suffering becoming daily occurrences. Educators and school administrators report being overwhelmed by the scale of the problem.

Disturbing data collected by the movement reveals that in a sample group of 48 students, 40% disclosed engaging in or contemplating self-harm behaviors. Narine emphasized that these statistics represent real children—sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters—whose suffering demands immediate action rather than bureaucratic delays.

The upcoming briefing will convene mental health professionals, educators, and faith leaders to address multiple critical aspects: the growing evidence of trauma in schools, the long-term consequences of inaction on communities, and the church’s potential role in providing healing and hope. Organizers stress that this event transcends a typical press conference, serving instead as a rallying cry for comprehensive societal response.

The Samaritan Movement is advocating for the government to declare the situation a national emergency and prioritize trauma-informed educational approaches and community care systems. Simultaneously, they’re calling on private sector entities to fund mental health initiatives that reach directly into schools and homes. Civil society organizations and faith communities are being urged to mobilize networks of care and mentorship, while parents and citizens are encouraged to create supportive environments where young people feel safe to share their struggles.