作者： admin

The deployment of US warships in Caribbean waters, including one docked at the Port of Spain, has ignited a heated debate over regional security and the fight against the drug trade. While the US frames its actions as necessary to protect its citizens and the wider region from the scourge of narcotics, local voices have raised concerns about the implications of such military presence. The Antilles Episcopal Conference has issued a strongly worded letter condemning these actions and advocating for peace, questioning the long-term consequences of militarized interventions. In a region historically plagued by gang violence and the devastating effects of the drug trade, the arrival of US forces has been met with mixed reactions. Some view it as a decisive step toward curbing the narcotics epidemic, while others fear it undermines the Caribbean’s identity as a ‘zone of peace.’ The USS Gravely’s presence, however, sends a clear message to narco-terrorists that the region is no longer undefended. This development comes amid a broader call for unity and action against the drug trade, which has long ravaged communities and corrupted institutions. The Vatican has consistently condemned drug-related activities, with Pope Francis emphasizing that addiction is an evil that demands unyielding resistance. Yet, the Caribbean’s struggle against the narcotics economy remains fraught with challenges, including complicity and inaction. As the region grapples with these issues, the question remains: Can decisive action, even if led by external forces, bring about the peace and justice that decades of prayer and advocacy have sought?

The victory of the United National Congress (UNC) in the 2025 elections was largely driven by the numerous promises made to the electorate. However, the reality of fulfilling these pledges is proving to be a daunting task for the government. Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar and her administration are now grappling with the financial implications of their campaign commitments, which include a 10% salary increase for public servants and the distribution of laptops to students. These initiatives, though popular, are facing delays due to budgetary constraints—a challenge the UNC was well aware of during the campaign but chose to downplay. The government’s inability to secure sufficient funds is likely to place additional financial burdens on citizens. Already, landlords are being asked to contribute more, electricity rates for commercial and industrial users are rising, and new taxes are being introduced, all of which will ultimately affect consumers. There is also speculation that the government may resort to withdrawing significant amounts from the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund to meet its obligations. This situation highlights a recurring issue in Trinidad and Tobago’s political landscape: election promises often fail to materialize, leaving the population disillusioned. The gap between the wealthy and the less fortunate continues to widen, while politicians maintain their privileged lifestyles. The author of the letter, Arnold Gopeesingh, expresses skepticism about any meaningful change, citing arrogance, disrespect, and divisiveness as prevailing attitudes among leaders. He warns that unless these behaviors are addressed, the nation will continue to face the consequences of its actions.

In a compelling letter to the editor, Gordon Laughlin highlights the significant benefits of supporting Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s leadership. Laughlin emphasizes that her efforts have brought genuine exposure, economic growth, and international attention, which are crucial for development and trade. The influx of foreign investment, particularly from the United States, has bolstered infrastructure and technical expertise, providing a stable foundation for economic expansion. This, in turn, has created new opportunities for local businesses and communities. Additionally, Laughlin underscores the importance of internal stability and addressing disruptive elements to foster a peaceful society. Such stability not only attracts investment but also inspires confidence and paves the way for progress. While acknowledging the presence of jealousy and opposition, Laughlin advocates for unity and collective support to ensure that the benefits of leadership reach those in need. He concludes by stressing the necessity of supporting a leader committed to development, resilience, and peace, especially during challenging times. Ultimately, Laughlin believes that a collective effort and a positive focus will guide the nation toward a peaceful and prosperous future for all.

Former Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, SC, has extended his congratulations to newly-appointed Chief Justice Ronnie Boodoosingh, emphasizing the need for the Judiciary to seize this transition as a pivotal moment to restore public trust in the justice system. In a statement issued on October 29, Maharaj lauded Justice Boodoosingh as “eminently qualified, deserving, and suitable” for the nation’s highest judicial office, praising his “dedication to duty, integrity, and commitment to the independence of the Judiciary and the rule of law.” Maharaj highlighted that Boodoosingh’s “calmness, patience, and fairness” are essential qualities for navigating the “serious challenges” currently facing the justice system. While acknowledging debates surrounding the consultation process preceding the appointment, Maharaj underscored the constitutional importance of ensuring fairness and transparency in selecting a Chief Justice, which he believes bolsters public confidence. He also recognized the contributions of former Chief Justice Ivor Archie but stressed the urgent need for reforms to address systemic issues. Maharaj called on the public to support Justice Boodoosingh in his efforts to tackle these challenges, reminding citizens that the courts are the guardians of their rights. Meanwhile, Senior Counsel Martin Daly criticized the appointment process as “poorly handled” and lacking transparency, despite supporting Boodoosingh’s elevation. Daly questioned the abrupt transition and the rushed consultation process, suggesting it weakened public trust. Attorney Yaseen Ahmed, a longtime colleague of Boodoosingh, praised his integrity and academic excellence, endorsing his appointment as Chief Justice.

During a Senate debate on October 27, Opposition Senator Vishnu Dhanpaul and Independent Senator Anthony Vieira, SC, raised critical questions regarding the proposed increases in duties on alcohol and tobacco in Trinidad and Tobago’s 2025/2026 budget. The motions aimed to implement these duties, which Finance Minister Davendranath Tancoo estimated could generate approximately $800 million in revenue. However, Dhanpaul expressed skepticism about achieving this target, citing historical data from 2017 when a 20% increase in alcohol taxes led to a revenue drop from $900 million to $700 million. He also highlighted potential structural issues, such as increased smuggling and consumption of harmful products, as well as the cultural impact on traditions like Christmas and Carnival. Dhanpaul criticized the lack of a clear link between the tax hikes and public health benefits, noting that revenues would likely go directly into the Consolidated Fund rather than health initiatives. Vieira echoed these concerns, emphasizing the absence of stakeholder consultation and the adverse effects on businesses, tourism, and low-income earners. He warned that the sudden implementation of higher duties could disrupt cash flows, breach supply contracts, and make Trinidad and Tobago one of the most expensive destinations in the Caribbean for alcohol consumption. Both senators argued that the measures could erode social traditions and harm the hospitality sector, particularly small businesses and neighborhood bars. In contrast, Minister Kennedy Swaratsingh defended the tax hikes as part of a caring government’s efforts to uplift the poor and vulnerable, estimating potential health sector savings of $260 million.

Commissioner of Police Allister Guevarro has emphasized the necessity of extending the current State of Emergency (SoE) to effectively dismantle criminal networks in Trinidad and Tobago. Speaking on October 29, Guevarro highlighted the significant progress made since the SoE was first implemented on July 18, but cautioned that criminal elements remain adaptable and persistent. He recommended a further extension to ensure long-term stability, stressing that the final decision rests with Parliament. Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar confirmed on October 27 that Guevarro had formally advised the government to extend the measure. The government has scheduled a parliamentary debate for October 31 to discuss the proposed extension. While the government does not require opposition support to approve an additional three-month extension in the Lower House, any period beyond that would necessitate a three-fifths majority. The initial SoE was declared in response to a surge in murders and intelligence reports of planned attacks by criminal networks, targeting senior government officials, judiciary members, law enforcement officers, and prison personnel. Under the SoE, the police and Defence Force have been granted enhanced powers to arrest suspects and conduct searches. Guevarro clarified that his recommendation is based solely on internal security assessments and not influenced by regional tensions involving Venezuela and the United States.