The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) has launched a scathing critique of Barbados’ newly enacted Family Leave Act, condemning it as a law that criminalizes parents, infringes on women’s reproductive rights, and prioritizes employers over families. Introduced by Labour Minister Colin Jordan, the legislation has been celebrated by the government as a historic advancement in parental rights, introducing statutory paternity leave for the first time in the nation’s history. Fathers are now entitled to three weeks of leave, which can be taken consecutively or split within the first six months of a child’s life. Maternity leave has been extended from 12 to 14 weeks (17 weeks for multiple births), and the maternity grant has been replaced with a gender-neutral child grant. However, during a virtual discussion hosted by the DLP, party representatives and legal experts argued that the law is not only insufficient but also ‘immoral.’ Malissa Howard, a DLP candidate, acknowledged the introduction of paternity leave as an improvement over the repealed Employment of Women (Maternity Leave) Act but criticized the three-week period as inadequate compared to international standards. She emphasized the need for greater support for women, suggesting six months of leave for fathers. Opposition Senator Andre Worrell echoed these concerns, advocating for extended leave beyond the immediate post-natal period, particularly when mothers return to work. He warned that without such provisions, parents are often forced to rely on nurseries, which many prefer to avoid in a child’s first year. Worrell also criticized the provision granting fathers an additional three weeks of leave if their partner dies during childbirth, calling it insufficient. Section 15 of the law, which criminalizes providing false information about pregnancy or birth with penalties of up to $10,000 or 24 months’ imprisonment, has drawn particular ire. Opposition Leader Ralph Thorne condemned this as an intrusion of criminal law into family life, arguing that it undermines the sanctity of pregnancy and birth by treating it as a contractual matter. Thorne also criticized the requirement that both parents must be employed continuously for 12 months to qualify for leave, calling it ‘immoral’ and discriminatory. Attorney Damien Fanus highlighted that some women may not know they are pregnant until months into employment, leaving them ineligible for benefits. Felicia Dujon, the DLP’s education spokesperson, accused the law of violating women’s reproductive rights and warned of potential workplace discrimination. Fanus further noted that protections against dismissal only apply during leave, leaving parents vulnerable upon their return to work. The DLP has called for significant revisions to the law, arguing that it fails to adequately support families and disproportionately favors employers.