Society has long embraced idols of Roman, Babylonian, and Greek origin, displayed prominently in public squares, churches, universities, and government buildings without question. Yet, when a new or unfamiliar structure, such as the one on All Saints Road in Antigua, is erected, it sparks widespread outrage. This selective acceptance raises a critical question: If we are to condemn one, consistency demands we examine and renounce them all, as their roots trace back to the same ancient pagan systems. Historically, the Roman Empire absorbed deities from Babylon, Greece, and other conquered nations, giving them Latin names while retaining their pagan functions. For instance, Zeus became Jupiter, Aphrodite became Venus, and Tammuz, the Babylonian god, was integrated into Roman mystery religions. These idols persist in Western art, religion, and architecture through statues, holidays, and place names, with many ‘Christian’ symbols actually being Romanized pagan symbols rebranded over centuries. The Bible is unequivocal on idolatry, with passages like Exodus 20:3–5, Deuteronomy 12:2–3, Isaiah 42:8, and Acts 17:29 clearly forbidding the worship of graven images, regardless of their cultural origin or familiarity. Today’s selective moral outrage—accepting familiar pagan symbols as ‘culture’ or ‘history’ while condemning unfamiliar ones as spiritual threats—is hypocritical. Biblically and historically, there is no difference; both are pagan and contrary to divine commandments. If one idol is to be rejected, all must be examined under the same standard. The Most High does not play favorites between idols.
LETTER: No Idol Is Innocent: A Call for Consistency in Faith and History
