The nomination of retired military officer and former Health Minister, Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Bostic, as Barbados’ second President has ignited significant controversy, with Kemar Stuart, leader of the New National Party (NNP), raising concerns about potential political bias and threats to the independence of the presidency. In a strongly worded statement issued on Thursday, Stuart criticized the nomination process, describing it as a “backroom decision” orchestrated by Prime Minister Mia Mottley and Opposition Leader Ralph Thorne, both members of the ruling Barbados Labour Party (BLP). Stuart argued that Bostic’s overt affiliation with the BLP introduces a conflict of interest, undermining the impartiality expected of the presidential office. He emphasized that the selection of a partisan figure for this constitutionally influential role could erode public trust in Barbados’ parliamentary democracy. Stuart highlighted the President’s authority to appoint seven independent Senators, warning that partisan appointments could consolidate power within a single party, effectively dismantling democratic checks and balances. To address these concerns, Stuart proposed that, upon confirmation, Bostic should invite minority parties, including the NNP, United Progressive Party (UPP), Friends of Democracy, and the CBLP, to nominate individuals for Senate appointments. According to Stuart, this approach would restore balance, reignite voter engagement, and prevent the emergence of a one-party state. Parliament is set to vote on Bostic’s nomination in October, with his potential inauguration scheduled for November 30, following the conclusion of President Dame Sandra Mason’s term.