AI bets lift global growth, but IMF flags rising risks

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects global economic growth of 3.3% this year while issuing a stark warning that the artificial intelligence revolution driving this expansion contains inherent vulnerabilities that could trigger widespread instability. While acknowledging the private sector’s remarkable adaptability in maintaining supply chains and favorable financial conditions, the IMF emphasized that risks remain decidedly tilted toward the downside, with growth concentration in information technology and AI—particularly within the United States—creating new systemic vulnerabilities.

Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, Chief Economist and Director of the IMF’s Research Department, revealed that “IT investment, as a share of output, has surged to an all-time high.” This technological investment generates positive global growth through robust demand for technology goods, especially from Asian markets. However, the boom has been substantially fueled by favorable financial conditions that are increasingly shifting toward debt financing—a transition that could magnify economic shocks if anticipated returns fail to materialize.

Drawing comparisons to the 1995-2000 dot-com bubble, the IMF assessment indicates that current US equity market overvaluation remains relatively modest. Nevertheless, a moderate correction in AI-related stock valuations, coupled with tighter financial conditions, could reduce global output by 0.4% in 2026. The potential impact would be magnified by several structural factors: many critical AI firms remain privately held and heavily debt-dependent, increasing their vulnerability to financial shocks. Additionally, US equity market capitalization has reached historically high levels relative to economic output, meaning any correction would disproportionately affect consumer spending. The substantial increase in foreign ownership of US equities in recent years further raises the risk of global spillover effects.

The technology surge carries simultaneous upside potential—if productivity gains materialize as projected, global output could increase by 0.3% in 2026. The World Economic Outlook concurrently projects a continued easing of global inflation, slowing from 4.1% in 2025 to 3.8% this year, with a further decline to 3.4% anticipated by 2027.

Beyond technological vulnerabilities, the IMF identified weakened fiscal discipline as a critical concern. Since the pandemic, looser fiscal policies have increased public debt by an additional 2-8% of GDP in advanced economies—exceeding the debt accumulation observed in emerging markets. This erosion of fiscal buffers jeopardizes governments’ capacity to address future economic challenges, including population aging, climate transition, national security requirements, and responsiveness to major economic shocks.

The IMF further emphasized that central bank independence remains crucial for maintaining economic stability, noting that weakened credibility could elevate inflation expectations and reduce global demand for US assets—potentially lowering global output by 0.3% in 2026. Gourinchas explicitly warned that “threats to central bank independence are increasing and must be firmly resisted.”

Geopolitical tensions represent another substantial concern, with fresh trade conflicts emerging alongside existing challenges. Following trade tensions that suppressed global activity last year, new geopolitical risks—including US intervention in Venezuela, escalating tensions involving Greenland, and renewed threats of tariffs and retaliation—are clouding the 2026 outlook. The IMF acknowledged that escalating geopolitical risk and further trade tensions remain among the most pressing challenges confronting the global economy, with current projections assuming maintained tariff levels of 18.5% for the US against the rest of the world. Recent US threats to impose tariffs on several European countries regarding opposition to US ambitions in Greenland have already triggered market volatility and heightened concerns among global policymakers, with the IMF cautioning that such conflicts could destabilize financial markets and impede growth.