Walters questions bid to acquire Savvy on the Bay land

A contentious political debate has emerged regarding the government’s proposed land acquisition adjacent to Savvy on the Bay, with Opposition Senator Ryan Walters leading criticism against what he characterizes as unnecessary targeting of an established small business enterprise.

During parliamentary deliberations on the Tourism Levy (Amendment) Bill, Senator Walters challenged the administration’s rationale for acquiring the neighboring parking facility, citing recent formal notices that have generated apprehension among local entrepreneurs. The senator articulated concerns that the move contradicts the government’s stated commitment to fostering business development.

Housing and Lands Minister Christopher Gibbs attempted to allay fears, asserting that business operators should remain unworried about the acquisition process. “Our objective as an administration is to promote entrepreneurial ventures, not to impede business operations,” Gibbs emphasized, promising maintained access and improved facilities upon project completion.

However, Senator Walters presented contradictory firsthand observations from multiple visits to the Bay Street location. “I’ve frequently visited Savvy on the Bay, utilizing both on-site and opposite parking facilities without encountering access restrictions,” the opposition legislator recounted. He described unimpeded beach access with his family, including purchases from local vendors and bar patronage without property disputes.

The senator questioned the government’s particular interest in this specific parcel, noting numerous alternative development opportunities along Bay Street. He highlighted underutilized properties including the former Mobil service station and abandoned fish market as preferable alternatives. “Why pursue a plot supporting an active business when vacant lands remain available just a stone’s throw away?” Walters inquired.

The opposition figure expressed bewilderment at the government’s approach, suggesting the strategy contradicts public encouragement of entrepreneurship and has generated confusion among both business operators and observers alike.