In a significant move to modernize its judicial system, Guyana has launched a comprehensive initiative to overhaul the regulation of its legal profession. The proposed reforms, announced during the opening of the 2026 Law Year, center on establishing mandatory continuing legal education and strengthening disciplinary mechanisms for both lawyers and judges.
Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs Anil Nandlall emphasized the urgent need for “a system of rigid and accountable continuing education” during his address. He revealed plans to collaborate with Guyana Bar Association President Kamal Ramkarran later this month to restructure the regulatory framework, responding to growing public concerns about professional conduct within the legal community.
Mr. Ramkarran expressed serious concerns about the current state of professional regulation, noting the complete absence of continuing education requirements. “If a lawyer never wanted to read another law book or judgment after law school, it would be completely open for that lawyer to do so,” he stated. The Bar Association president also proposed a graduated induction system for new lawyers rather than burdening recently graduated counsel with full responsibilities immediately.
The judiciary leadership strongly endorsed these reform efforts. Chancellor of the Judiciary Roxane George-Wiltshire recommended amending the Legal Practitioners Act—originally drafted in 1897 and last updated in 2010—to require annual registration contingent on completing minimum hours of continuing education. “An educated and regulated legal profession will increase the efficiency and integrity of the administration of justice,” she asserted, offering the judiciary’s collaboration in developing legislative reforms.
Chief Justice Navindra Singh welcomed the newfound consensus on continuing education, recalling his unsuccessful attempt to introduce similar measures a decade ago that faced resistance from the legal community. “I’m glad that they now recognize that continuing legal education is not for us. It is for all. It is for the judges and the lawyers and it is for the litigants to enjoy proper representation,” he remarked.
The reform discussions also addressed significant gaps in disciplinary processes. Mr. Ramkarran revealed that no lawyer has faced suspension or removal proceedings in over 25 years, despite persistent complaints about case delays caused by unprepared attorneys frequently seeking adjournments. He called for “open and transparent systems to deal with misbehavior of judges and lawyers in a proper and fair manner.”
While Attorney General Nandlall acknowledged the possibility of maintaining self-regulation for the profession, he emphasized that this privilege must be matched by responsibility and accountability. The proposed reforms represent the most substantial potential changes to Guyana’s legal governance structure since the country’s independence in 1966.