A major statutory corporation in Antigua and Barbuda faces internal turmoil and widespread concern as reports emerge regarding the potential reinstatement of a supervisor terminated nearly two years ago following multiple substantiated allegations of sexual harassment. This development surfaces ironically during the nation’s observance of the global 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence, drawing sharp criticism from female employees who view the move as a severe regression in workplace safety and gender equality.
According to internal sources, the initial dismissal followed written complaints from five to six women who detailed a pattern of predatory behavior. The allegations included making unsolicited sexual advances, explicitly soliciting sexual favors in exchange for confirming employment contracts, and exploiting performance review meetings to coerce subordinates. Employees who resisted his advances reported subsequent retaliation through deliberately poor performance evaluations. Further complaints alleged he routinely consumed pornographic material on corporate devices during work hours.
Following his dismissal, the former supervisor escalated the matter to the Industrial Court, where the case remains pending and unresolved. However, recent negotiations involving government officials have reportedly included discussions about his return to the organization. This possibility has ignited fears among staff, particularly women, who argue that reinstatement would fundamentally undermine the corporation’s integrity and its commitment to protecting employees.
The situation is further exacerbated by the corporation’s demographic reality: its senior management team remains exclusively male. Employees note that this lack of gender diversity has historically made it difficult for complaints from women to receive adequate attention and action. A staff member, speaking on condition of anonymity, condemned the potential reinstatement as “a demoralizing step backward” that would signal tolerance for misconduct and erode trust in internal protection mechanisms. The controversy highlights the ongoing challenges in combating workplace harassment and ensuring accountable governance within public institutions.