In a heated debate in Barbados’ House of Assembly this Tuesday, Toni Moore — St George North Member of Parliament and General Secretary of the Barbados Workers’ Union (BWU) — has called on fellow legislators to reopen discussion on several key recommendations left out of the government’s updated Protection of Wages Bill, arguing that the omissions leave critical gaps in safeguards for the country’s workforce.
Introduced by Labour Minister Colin Jordan, the bill is framed as a modernization of existing wage protection rules, but Moore says its true test lies not in updating language, but in delivering tangible, enforceable protections for working people. One of the core unadopted recommendations she is pushing to revive would tighten statutory language to require that all wages are paid on a regular working day by the established payday. Moore explained that bad actors currently exploit the lack of this rule to delay wage payments to weekends, when all financial institutions are closed, forcing workers who have already completed a full week of work to wait until the next business day to access their earnings — leaving many unable to buy immediate necessities like groceries.
Moore offered measured praise for one new provision in the bill that formalizes employers’ ability to process authorized deductions from wages for credit union contributions, insurance premiums and loan repayments. She noted that for years, many employers have arbitrarily refused to carry out these deductions even when workers explicitly request them, creating severe financial hardship: workers are often locked out of accessing mortgages without this automated deduction arrangement, and mid-stream cancellation of deductions by employers can push workers into default and financial instability through no fault of their own.
However, Moore voiced sharp criticism of Section 14 of the bill, which allows employers to recover wage overpayments from future earnings with no statutory time limit. She argued that the open-ended provision is unreasonable, noting that employers could claim overpayments from five, 10, or even 15 years prior, forcing workers to absorb unexpected deductions for errors that were often caused by the employer’s own faulty payroll systems. Citing past issues with underreported payroll errors among former Berger Paints workers, Moore proposed a clear cap on recovery windows, suggesting between six and 12 months as a reasonable timeframe. Though this proposal was rejected during initial drafting, Moore stressed that it must be revisited to protect workers who plan their household budgets around their expected full wages.
Moore also put forward another key reform demand: immediate payment of all owed wages when employment is terminated, even in cases of summary dismissal. She argued that once an employment relationship ends, all outstanding payments should be settled when the National Insurance Scheme termination certificate is issued, unless the two parties agree otherwise. She added that while automated payroll systems may not always accommodate immediate off-cycle payments, manual adjustments can and should be made to deliver timely payment to dismissed workers, allowing them to move forward without financial uncertainty.
Another major concern Moore raised centers on Section 29 of the bill, which excludes workers under “cooperation agreements” from the law’s protections. She warned that this vague language opens the door to widespread worker misclassification, particularly for people in informal work and the growing gig economy, who will be left without any wage protection if employers intentionally reclassify their employment status.
Beyond the Protection of Wages Bill, Moore used the debate to renew longstanding calls for broader reform of Barbados’ Employment Rights Act. She pointed out that inconsistent employment tribunal procedures, arbitrary caps on compensation awards, and widespread difficulties enforcing tribunal rulings continue to block workers from accessing meaningful justice. For example, she noted that the current act allows tribunals to set their own procedural rules, which led to one high-profile case where the tribunal chair adopted complex Supreme Court rules — turning what was supposed to be a accessible, streamlined process for workers into a costly, overly litigious battle. To this day, there are no consistent, standardized rules across tribunals, creating unpredictable procedures and requirements that disadvantage workers who rarely have the resources to navigate shifting legal expectations. “Workers deserve predictability,” Moore emphasized.
Moore also called out a problematic misinterpretation of the Minimum Wages Act by a major local company identified only as BEC. The company is classifying sales commissions as part of the statutory minimum wage, allowing it to pay a base wage lower than the legally required $10.71 an hour, with the difference made up by variable commissions. Moore explained that this practice erodes workers’ financial stability and hurts their ability to qualify for mortgages and other loans, noting that the complaint has been sitting with the Labour Department for almost a year without resolution.
To make all existing and new labour laws effective, Moore stressed that the Labour Department needs both adequate staffing and targeted resourcing — a distinction she drew, noting that headcount alone does not guarantee capacity to deliver. The department needs sufficient resources both to educate employers and workers on new laws, and to consistently enforce protections across all workplaces. She added that public education on labour rules is a foundational requirement for any effective legislation.
Closing her remarks, Moore clarified that she supports the Protection of Wages Bill as a meaningful step forward for worker protection, but said it requires targeted refinement to deliver on its promises. “We don’t expect perfection, so we will not stop it, but what we expect is that we will continue to work at it, to improve on it, to make sure it delivers in very practical ways to the people on whose behalf all of us in here commit to serve,” she said, pledging to continue advocating for stronger, more inclusive labour laws across Barbados.