In a comprehensive analytical piece, retired career diplomat Jorge Castaneda has called for a crucial national dialogue regarding Peru’s potential designation as a Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) of the United States. The seasoned ambassador’s assessment, published on Efectividat Consultores’ digital platform, presents a balanced examination of the strategic partnership recently proposed by the Trump administration.
Castaneda emphasizes that any definitive decision must be predicated on a fundamental national discourse that clarifies Peru’s aspirations as an international actor. He insists this deliberation must objectively weigh the tangible benefits against the established principles of autonomy and alliance diversification that have traditionally guided Peruvian foreign policy.
The diplomatic expert issues a significant cautionary note, stating that only through a coherent, long-term state strategy can Peru determine whether MNNA status would serve as a valuable instrument for national objectives or instead represent an unnecessary and potentially counterproductive commitment. He underscores that the effectiveness of such designation critically depends on the recipient nation’s strength, cohesion, and strategic clarity.
Central to Castaneda’s argument is the assertion that Peruvian foreign policy—not the partnering nation—must unequivocally define the utilization parameters and limitations of any diplomatic or security arrangement. This positioning reaffirms the necessity of maintaining sovereign control over international engagements while considering enhanced cooperation frameworks.