Jamaica’s Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Minister Daryl Vaz has vigorously rebutted allegations that the Government exhibits intolerance toward criticism, characterizing its assertive public communications as evidence of dedication rather than arrogance. The minister’s remarks came during a Jamaica Observer Press Club engagement last Thursday, where he addressed the administration’s messaging strategy following Hurricane Melissa’s devastating impact.
Vaz articulated that the Government’s firm tone during the national emergency stems from the critical need for precise information dissemination rather than any attempt to suppress legitimate debate. He distinguished between constructive scrutiny and what he termed “misleading narratives” that could potentially hamper recovery operations. The minister emphasized that his cautious communication approach was dictated by the crisis severity and persistent public anxiety over extended power outages.
A central point of contention has been the US$150-million loan facility extended to Jamaica Public Service (JPS) for accelerating electricity restoration since the October 28, 2025 hurricane. Vaz expressed particular frustration with what he described as misrepresentations regarding this financial arrangement, clarifying that the amount was specifically calculated for restoration needs rather than being arbitrarily determined.
The loan has emerged as a political flashpoint, with Opposition figures including Leader Mark Golding questioning the sum’s adequacy and advocating for clearer parliamentary assurances about long-term funding. Vaz countered that such public criticisms risk creating confusion among already strained communities and potentially delaying urgent action.
The minister revealed ongoing communication with Opposition energy spokesman Phillip Paulwell throughout the crisis, including advance notification about the Cabinet’s decision to transition from license arrangements to loan mechanisms for restoration acceleration. Vaz noted that the most vigorous parliamentary objections originated from other opposition members despite these consultations.
To facilitate constructive dialogue, Vaz has implemented pre-parliamentary engagement practices—encouraging opposition members to submit questions beforehand for comprehensive on-record responses. He maintains that his firm public posture reflects emergency urgency rather than debate aversion, reiterating his openness to rational discussions focused on national interest beyond political considerations.