During a recent youth rally, a ‘special guest’ took the stage to address the audience on behalf of the United Labour Party (ULP). However, her speech was less an endorsement and more a plea for assistance, a pattern familiar to those who know her well. Even Candyman, who introduced her, has previously noted this tendency after prolonged interactions. While I have been a lifelong supporter of Labour, my current uncertainty stems not from anger at the opposition New Democratic Party (NDP) but from dissatisfaction with how the ULP has managed key issues over the past five years, including the controversial vaccine mandate. Her speech did little to strengthen my allegiance to the ULP; instead, it deepened my reflection on Mike Browne’s commentary, pushing me toward abstaining from voting in the upcoming election. Her intelligence, eloquence, and confidence are undeniable, but she may not be what the ULP needs now. Her past remarks, such as labeling Curtis King a ‘disgrace’ and dismissing Keisal Peters as merely a ‘wardrobe and a hair salon,’ raise questions about her alignment with the party. Despite her criticisms of the NDP, their leadership remained silent, perhaps recognizing the underlying motivations behind her outbursts. As the ULP welcomes her into a visible role, internal warnings are emerging publicly, urging caution. Will the party heed these concerns, or will history repeat itself?