The essence of education lies not in imposing control but in igniting curiosity and growth. However, in many schools, outdated disciplinary methods, such as corporal punishment, continue to overshadow this ideal. For instance, students are often subjected to physical punishment for minor infractions like tardiness—a practice that seems more regressive than constructive.
Such methods raise critical questions about the alignment of school discipline with real-world expectations. In professional environments, tardiness might result in a written warning, a pay deduction, or a discussion, but never physical harm. Why, then, should educational institutions, which are meant to foster development and learning, resort to such measures? We live in an era that has moved beyond the oppressive systems of the past, having fought for independence not just politically but also mentally, rejecting the notion that violence equates to discipline.
Physical punishment may instill fear, but fear does not cultivate responsibility. Instead, it stifles voices, breeds resentment, and teaches young minds that pain is the cost of correction. There are more effective alternatives. Schools can encourage reflection by engaging late students in meaningful conversations about the value of time or assigning them tasks that build character rather than shame.
True discipline should shape individuals, not leave lasting scars. If schools aim to prepare students for life, their lessons must stem from respect, not fear. As the saying goes, ‘Violence may control a body, but respect reaches the soul.’ It is high time that educational institutions prioritize reaching souls over enforcing compliance.