In a powerful address marking the ceremonial opening of the legal year at Christ Church Cathedral, Anglican Bishop Laish Boyd delivered a scathing critique of The Bahamas’ judiciary system, challenging legal professionals to enact urgent reforms. The senior cleric highlighted systemic inequities, excessive procedural delays, and discriminatory practices that he argued undermine justice.
Bishop Boyd identified protracted case timelines as a fundamental flaw, noting that drawn-out legal processes inflict financial strain, consume excessive time, and generate significant anxiety for those involved. He asserted that much of the bureaucratic complexity is artificially ‘manufactured for convenience, for delay, for spite or because you [are] having a bad day,’ and called for a simplification of procedures.
The Bishop’s most forceful condemnation focused on stark disparities in treatment based on wealth and race. He posed a pointed rhetorical question to the assembled legal fraternity: why a poor Black individual committing the same crime as a wealthy or white person often faces harsher treatment or sentencing. Drawing audible reactions from the audience, he labeled this differential treatment ‘disgraceful’ and a betrayal of the vision of justice bequeathed by the nation’s forebears.
Furthermore, Bishop Boyd urged profound self-reflection within the judiciary, pressing them to confront difficult questions about systemic fairness, potential corruption, political interference, and whether the system genuinely serves and protects its most vulnerable users. He concluded by reminding attendees that the ultimate value of any institution lies in its humanity and how individuals treat one another, exhorting them to ‘strive to make a difference.’
In response, Attorney General Ryan Pinder cautioned against broad generalizations regarding sentencing. He emphasized that judges must evaluate each case independently based on its unique facts and circumstances. Mr. Pinder expressed his full confidence in the judiciary and pointed to newly introduced sentencing guidelines as a pivotal step toward enhancing predictability and transparency, particularly through the formal recognition of mitigating factors.