SANTO DOMINGO – The legal defense team for Santiago Hazim, former director of the National Health Insurance (Senasa), has formally challenged the 18-month pretrial detention order issued against him, asserting fundamental violations of his constitutional rights.
Attorney Miguel Valerio confirmed Tuesday that an appeal was submitted to the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Appeals of the National District. The defense contends that Judge Rigoberto Sena’s ruling improperly relied on subjective moral and ethical assessments rather than established legal principles. Valerio characterized the decision as lacking appropriate legal justification, noting the inclusion of extraneous biblical and literary references that bear no connection to the legal purpose of coercive measures.
The appeal argues that judicial references to alleged greed and moral disloyalty constitute improper grounds for detention that remain disconnected from the evidentiary requirements of the case. Additionally, the defense maintains that the detention order violates Hazim’s right to adequate medical care by preventing continuation of treatment for a serious health condition.
Valerio emphasized that preventive detention should serve specific procedural purposes—primarily preventing flight risk or evidence tampering—which he asserts were not substantiated in the ruling. The defense claims the court disregarded these legal standards, thereby compromising Hazim’s dignity and presumption of innocence.
The case involves allegations by the Public Prosecutor’s Office that Hazim and six co-defendants participated in the embezzlement of over RD$15 billion from Senasa. While Hazim and six others received pretrial detention, three additional defendants received alternative measures including electronic monitoring, travel restrictions, and mandatory court reporting. Their legal representatives have indicated their clients’ continued cooperation with ongoing investigations.