GENEVA—The Director-General of the World Health Organization issued a grave warning on Tuesday regarding the imminent U.S. departure from the UN health agency, characterizing the move as detrimental to both American and global health security. The caution came as the one-year withdrawal process, initiated by former President Donald Trump’s executive order on January 20, 2025, approaches its finalization.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus expressed profound regret during a press briefing from the agency’s Geneva headquarters, stating that the withdrawal represents a significant loss for international public health cooperation. ‘This decision compromises safety not only within the United States but across the globe,’ Tedros emphasized. ‘It ultimately represents an ill-advised course of action.’
The WHO leader highlighted the critical benefits that the United States derives from its participation in the organization, particularly regarding health security initiatives. ‘There are numerous WHO-coordinated activities that substantially benefit the U.S., especially in the realm of health security preparedness,’ Tedros noted. ‘This is precisely why I maintain that American safety cannot be guaranteed without collaborative engagement with WHO.’
Legal complexities surrounding the withdrawal process emerged during the briefing. WHO Chief Legal Officer Steve Solomon clarified that while the organization’s constitution lacks explicit withdrawal provisions, the United States had established specific conditions for departure in 1948. These conditions include providing one year’s advance notice and fulfilling all financial obligations for the current fiscal year.
Solomon revealed that the United States currently maintains outstanding payments for both 2024 and 2025, though specific figures were not disclosed. This financial delinquency raises questions about whether the technical conditions for withdrawal have been satisfactorily met, a determination that ultimately rests with WHO member states.
The timing of the American exit proves particularly challenging as international health aid budgets face substantial reductions worldwide. Tedros acknowledged that ‘adequate funding remains crucial for our organization’s operational capacity,’ but stressed that the appeal for U.S. reconsideration ‘transcends financial considerations.’
The Director-General concluded with a powerful message about global health solidarity: ‘What truly matters is our collective cooperation and worldwide preparedness against common threats such as viral pathogens. In facing adversaries like COVID-19, our strongest defense remains unity. The most effective immunity is indeed solidarity.’