KINGSTON, Jamaica—Jamaica’s Department of Correctional Services (DCS) has formally rejected allegations that its electronic device restrictions are creating barriers to adequate legal representation for inmates. The controversy emerged amid claims that these restrictions contributed to procedural delays in the high-profile trial of alleged Clansman Gang leader Tesha Miller and two dozen co-defendants.
The correctional authority issued a detailed statement affirming its commitment to upholding inmates’ constitutional rights to legal counsel. This position was reportedly established during February 2025 discussions with the Jamaica Bar Association (JBA) and further elaborated in a March 19, 2025 correspondence from Correctional Commissioner Brigadier Radgh Mason.
According to released excerpts from the commissioner’s letter, the DCS acknowledges the fundamental nature of legal representation rights and emphasizes compliance with the Corrections Act of 1985 and subsequent Correctional Institution Rules from 1991. These regulations govern how legal visits and communications must be administered within prison facilities.
The department outlined specific accommodations for legal professionals, including: reasonable scheduling of inmate interviews; weekday access to second-division inmates; discretionary Saturday visits depending on institutional circumstances; and the implementation of a contact matrix system to streamline visit coordination.
Notably, the DCS stated that virtual consultation platforms and electronic devices such as laptops and tablets may be permitted when deemed “safe, reasonable, justified and practicable.” This conditional allowance represents a compromise between security concerns and legal access requirements.
The department concluded by encouraging formal reporting of any alleged rights violations, promising serious investigation through appropriate legal and institutional channels.