A North Carolina court has delivered a landmark $1.75 million judgment against social media influencer Brenay Kennard, highlighting one of America’s rarest legal statutes: alienation of affection. The November verdict came after Akira Montague successfully sued Kennard for destroying her marriage through an affair with her then-husband, utilizing a centuries-old law that remains active in only six US states.
This legal framework treats marriage as a institution worthy of protection against external interference, with historical settlements reaching $30 million. The Kennard case took particularly egregious turns when the influencer faced additional charges last Thursday for violating a restraining order and continuing cyber harassment campaigns against Montague—even after marrying the man she allegedly stole.
Marriage counselor Annette Palmer-Lowe provided psychological analysis: “Some individuals seek relationships validating desirability over substance. Being chosen over a spouse temporarily boosts self-esteem, particularly for those grappling with insecurity or inadequacy. Frequently, the pursuit reflects rivalry with the wife rather than genuine interest in the man.”
The case has sparked national conversation about relationship boundaries, illustrated through firsthand accounts:
Bre-Ann (27) described how a church member positioned herself as emotional support for her fiancé while excluding her entirely. Kimmy (32) recounted a neighbor who claimed to believe her marriage had ended despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Kimari (26) observed how repeated “helping” scenarios created familiarity that led to infidelity.
Keisha (40) confronted inappropriate messaging disguised as harmless flirting, noting: “Secret interactions rarely prove innocent.” Lori (38) identified a “work wife” who seemed more interested in replicating her life than pursuing her husband. Most shockingly, Nordia (30) received the justification that “men are naturally unfaithful” when confronting her husband’s pursuer.
These narratives collectively demonstrate how marital interference often involves systematic boundary erosion, psychological manipulation, and complex emotional motivations beyond simple attraction.