Distinguished Jamaican attorney Peter Champagnie, King’s Counsel, has proposed establishing a Criminal Justice Board to address systemic inefficiencies within the nation’s legal framework. This recommendation follows recent tensions between correctional authorities and defense lawyers regarding electronic device access in prisons.
The proposal emerges against the backdrop of a recent confrontation where Correctional Services Commissioner Brigadier (Ret’d) Radgh Mason appeared before the Supreme Court to address allegations that prison officials were preventing attorneys from bringing electronic devices to client meetings. Following vigorous arguments from defense attorneys Tamika Harris and John Clarke, the commissioner conceded, authorizing formal notices permitting electronic device access for attorneys, mirroring privileges already extended to medical professionals and investigative officials.
Champagnie cites Belize’s successful implementation of a similar multidisciplinary board as a model for Jamaica. “Belize has established a Criminal Justice Board that meets regularly with representation from correctional services, judiciary, security forces, medical facilities, lawyers, and prosecutors,” Champagnie explained. “This collaborative body ensures all stakeholders operate under consistent protocols and can address implementation gaps when judicial directives aren’t properly followed.”
The veteran legal expert emphasized that such a body could additionally serve as a mechanism for reviewing outdated legislation. He specifically referenced Jamaica’s Obeah Act, Unlawful Possession of Property Act, and aspects of the Firearms Act that inadequately address modern legal realities. Champagnie highlighted a 2017 case where alleged gang leader Tesha Miller received only a $100 fine for making false declarations to immigration officials as evidence of systemic inadequacy.
The electronic access controversy stems from an April 2024 practice direction issued by Chief Justice Bryan Sykes authorizing electronic disclosure methods for criminal trials. Despite this judicial mandate, defense attorneys reported continued resistance from prison facilities when attempting to utilize electronic devices for client consultations and document sharing—a critical capability given the shift toward digital evidence management.
Justice Vinette Graham-Allen, who originally advocated for the electronic disclosure reforms based on her Case Management Court experience, recently urged the Jamaican Bar Association to formally document these ongoing access issues, indicating persistent implementation challenges within Jamaica’s correctional system.