Stephanie Ann Braynen, permanently blinded in a devastating 2020 acid attack, has expressed complex emotions following the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold her attacker’s seven-year prison sentence. While relieved that Pandora McKenzie’s appeal for sentence reduction was denied just one year into her imprisonment, Braynen maintains the punishment constitutes ‘a slap on the wrist’ for what she describes as ‘premeditated attempted murder.’
The November 2020 assault left Braynen with irreversible blindness and significant facial disfigurement. Despite undergoing specialized treatment at Miami’s Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, medical professionals could not restore her vision. The victim now depends on her pension and requires substantial support from her children for daily living, though she has developed adaptive skills to navigate her home environment.
Braynen has raised serious concerns about the judicial handling of her case from its inception. She contends the initial charge of ‘grievous harm’ significantly underestimated the attack’s severity and suggests possible improper influence due to McKenzie’s son serving as a police officer. ‘The magistrate acknowledged this was attempted murder,’ Braynen recalled, ‘but indicated the seven-year term represented the maximum penalty allowable under the charged offense.’
The legal proceedings extended across four years, culminating in McKenzie’s conviction on September 16, 2024. The recent appeal, filed on September 8, resulted in the appellate court affirming both the conviction and original sentence. Braynen expressed disappointment that the appellate judges didn’t enhance the punishment, noting: ‘When you appeal, you disrespect what you were supposed to get. They should have added more time.’
Financial recourse remains unavailable as McKenzie lacks tangible assets for civil litigation. Adding to the tragedy, Braynen revealed that the man whose alleged affair motivated the attack has since divorced and remarried, regularly checking on her wellbeing and highlighting the senselessness of the violence.
Despite her profound losses, Braynen demonstrates remarkable resilience, explicitly stating she refuses to harbor bitterness and has extended forgiveness to her attacker. ‘I feel sad for her. I don’t hate her. I forgive her. But I won’t forget,’ she stated. While dissatisfied with the sentencing outcome, she acknowledges closure in the judicial process: ‘I’m glad they see fit she must stay and finish her time. It is what it is. I will live it. And I thank God I lived through it.’